This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles United States: Massachusetts This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts. Yorkshire Low‑importance Richard Saltonstall is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

When I click on the superscript "1," I am directed to what appears to be a generic page with various ads, none of which seem to have much to do with this subject. A search for "Saltonstall" using that page's "search window" turned up nothing. Therefore I propose that (unless someone else can get it to work) this link be deleted, as it appears it is no longer valid. Chillowack ( talk) 06:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC) reply

As it is a reference then it should not be removed but marked as a dead link using template {{ dead link}}. See Wikipedia:Link rot for further detail. Keith D ( talk) 12:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Chillowack ( talk) 08:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Not sure why the footnotes in this article are so inaccurate--#5 points to some AOL signup page.

If no one objects, I'm going to mark these links as dead and request accurate citations. Chillowack ( talk) 08:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC) reply