![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
California Sorcery is a collection of fiction from "The Group" (California writers including
Ray Bradbury,
Harlan Ellison, and
Robert Bloch who were responsible for the bulk of the Twilight Zone scripts). The book has an overview of the development of the group, with biographical details on each member provided there and, in brief, before that member's story.
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Koyaanis Qatsi (
talk •
contribs)
11:18, 25 May 2002 (UTC)
Wasn't "Duel" a TV movie? --squadfifteen, 18/10/05
Richard Corliss of Time Magazine wrote the movie review of I am Legend, called Will Smith Gets Lost in His Legend. In this article Corliss writes:
I emailed Corliss and said:
Incorrect movie listed:
NOT
...copy-editor missed this one. I was adding the information to wikipedia and noticed this. I guess wikipedia isn't the only organization which has mistakes. (See the Encyclopedia Dramatic vs. Wikipedia study, which showed Wikipedia was more accurate) But unlike wikipedia, I am unable to correct this glaring mistake. |
68.93.142.116 ( talk) 08:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I've replaced the "Career" section from the last good version before it was blanked at 01:40, 5 June 2009 by 76.64.225.108. It was blanked without explanation, and someone has since created an empty Career section and placed an {{expand}} template. If this section requires massive editing, please discuss that here or place the relevant template. Please do not gut the article by blanking entire sections without explanation. 12.233.146.130 ( talk) 20:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I thought he was dead. This article indicates he is still alive! Wow, that is great. I love his books. I am just starting to read them and they really are a treasure. I am now reading a book called "He is Legend" which is a tribute to Matheson and I thought it was in the form of a memorial, so I am glad to see the old man around to enjoy the tribute. In the picture, he looks healthy, not sure if he wants to gin up a few more books, though the beauty of his books is that they inspired others to write, so his work is the gift that keeps on giving. From my end, I just read them and quite glad I have discovered his works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.139.67.70 ( talk) 15:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
As of this moment, there is no reliable source that confirms Richard's death, so the prudent thing would do would be to wait until we have one before we post on his death. -- Jsderwin ( talk) 21:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
His daughter and son have both confirmed his death on Facebook and friend and author Steve Niles on twitter. 67.53.110.10 ( talk) 21:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/09/an-open-letter-to-wikipedia.html Nice find on that verification! -- Jsderwin ( talk) 22:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Here are three quotations from today's Sky News obituary [ref name=skynews]. The material may be worth incorporation here or in some of the linked articles.
--I guess he means the Bela Lugosi Dracula (1931 film)
-- 39th Saturn Awards (tomorrow); our articles do not mention the "visionary award"
-- P64 ( talk) 17:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Matheson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
California Sorcery is a collection of fiction from "The Group" (California writers including
Ray Bradbury,
Harlan Ellison, and
Robert Bloch who were responsible for the bulk of the Twilight Zone scripts). The book has an overview of the development of the group, with biographical details on each member provided there and, in brief, before that member's story.
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Koyaanis Qatsi (
talk •
contribs)
11:18, 25 May 2002 (UTC)
Wasn't "Duel" a TV movie? --squadfifteen, 18/10/05
Richard Corliss of Time Magazine wrote the movie review of I am Legend, called Will Smith Gets Lost in His Legend. In this article Corliss writes:
I emailed Corliss and said:
Incorrect movie listed:
NOT
...copy-editor missed this one. I was adding the information to wikipedia and noticed this. I guess wikipedia isn't the only organization which has mistakes. (See the Encyclopedia Dramatic vs. Wikipedia study, which showed Wikipedia was more accurate) But unlike wikipedia, I am unable to correct this glaring mistake. |
68.93.142.116 ( talk) 08:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I've replaced the "Career" section from the last good version before it was blanked at 01:40, 5 June 2009 by 76.64.225.108. It was blanked without explanation, and someone has since created an empty Career section and placed an {{expand}} template. If this section requires massive editing, please discuss that here or place the relevant template. Please do not gut the article by blanking entire sections without explanation. 12.233.146.130 ( talk) 20:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I thought he was dead. This article indicates he is still alive! Wow, that is great. I love his books. I am just starting to read them and they really are a treasure. I am now reading a book called "He is Legend" which is a tribute to Matheson and I thought it was in the form of a memorial, so I am glad to see the old man around to enjoy the tribute. In the picture, he looks healthy, not sure if he wants to gin up a few more books, though the beauty of his books is that they inspired others to write, so his work is the gift that keeps on giving. From my end, I just read them and quite glad I have discovered his works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.139.67.70 ( talk) 15:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
As of this moment, there is no reliable source that confirms Richard's death, so the prudent thing would do would be to wait until we have one before we post on his death. -- Jsderwin ( talk) 21:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
His daughter and son have both confirmed his death on Facebook and friend and author Steve Niles on twitter. 67.53.110.10 ( talk) 21:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/09/an-open-letter-to-wikipedia.html Nice find on that verification! -- Jsderwin ( talk) 22:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Here are three quotations from today's Sky News obituary [ref name=skynews]. The material may be worth incorporation here or in some of the linked articles.
--I guess he means the Bela Lugosi Dracula (1931 film)
-- 39th Saturn Awards (tomorrow); our articles do not mention the "visionary award"
-- P64 ( talk) 17:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Matheson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)