![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The final paragraph seems reasonable enough. What's the problem Ambi? DarrenRay 09:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Enough of the massive deletions Ambi. I don't why you do this but it is getting crazy. AChan 03:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
You say you live in Canberra. How do you know all this? AChan 03:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
I think if Ambi can come up with quotes from people who think Marles is not a "mover and shaker" or whatever that's perfectly OK. But what is the point of deleting the source? Let's be honest hear, there are editors of an anonymous/pseudonymous background who are not coming clean on their own prejudices and involvements. It's not the end of the world but I think we need to act with more courtesy please.
I do not think that a plain assertion (one I believe is false in any event) that Marles is unpopular is probably not worth including. From what I heard the Advertiser gave Marles a very good run. But if Ambi has an appropriate reference that indicates that he has no community support then let's look at it. But until then, give it a rest. And show some respect to Alex whose contributions have been great. Keep up the good work Alex, don't get bullied out of here. DarrenRay 03:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
The article is hardly misleading. It is described as one publication's view. Lists of Mover and Shakers are inherently opinion but as long as it is listed as such I don't see the problem. Why don't you try re-writing it, that might be better than arguing about it. DarrenRay 04:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Marles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Marles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The final paragraph seems reasonable enough. What's the problem Ambi? DarrenRay 09:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Enough of the massive deletions Ambi. I don't why you do this but it is getting crazy. AChan 03:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
You say you live in Canberra. How do you know all this? AChan 03:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
I think if Ambi can come up with quotes from people who think Marles is not a "mover and shaker" or whatever that's perfectly OK. But what is the point of deleting the source? Let's be honest hear, there are editors of an anonymous/pseudonymous background who are not coming clean on their own prejudices and involvements. It's not the end of the world but I think we need to act with more courtesy please.
I do not think that a plain assertion (one I believe is false in any event) that Marles is unpopular is probably not worth including. From what I heard the Advertiser gave Marles a very good run. But if Ambi has an appropriate reference that indicates that he has no community support then let's look at it. But until then, give it a rest. And show some respect to Alex whose contributions have been great. Keep up the good work Alex, don't get bullied out of here. DarrenRay 03:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
The article is hardly misleading. It is described as one publication's view. Lists of Mover and Shakers are inherently opinion but as long as it is listed as such I don't see the problem. Why don't you try re-writing it, that might be better than arguing about it. DarrenRay 04:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Marles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Marles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)