This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedy deleted because... -- Midgley ( talk) 20:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC) Still writing the second paragraph, actually. This chap set up a very large failed IT project. http://www.richardbacon.org.uk/speeches/110614_npfit_WH.html is well worth reading on it. Midgley ( talk) 20:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because... -- Midgley ( talk) 21:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
The editor who placed it is misusing the tag, and a review of his contributions indicates that he places this tag a lot, a review of his talk page will indicate that he pays little attention to the trail of them he has left. I think some counselling, or a RFC may be coming near. Midgley ( talk) 21:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
This article appears to have a very negative slant. As this Guardian article notes there was negative media coverage in relation to NHS Connecting for Health which he was manager of, but this article seems to be only presenting the negative. The tone needs to be edited in accordance with WP:BLPSTYLE.
I have requested input at the BLP noticeboard – WP:BLPN#Richard Granger. January ( talk) 11:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedy deleted because... -- Midgley ( talk) 20:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC) Still writing the second paragraph, actually. This chap set up a very large failed IT project. http://www.richardbacon.org.uk/speeches/110614_npfit_WH.html is well worth reading on it. Midgley ( talk) 20:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because... -- Midgley ( talk) 21:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
The editor who placed it is misusing the tag, and a review of his contributions indicates that he places this tag a lot, a review of his talk page will indicate that he pays little attention to the trail of them he has left. I think some counselling, or a RFC may be coming near. Midgley ( talk) 21:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
This article appears to have a very negative slant. As this Guardian article notes there was negative media coverage in relation to NHS Connecting for Health which he was manager of, but this article seems to be only presenting the negative. The tone needs to be edited in accordance with WP:BLPSTYLE.
I have requested input at the BLP noticeboard – WP:BLPN#Richard Granger. January ( talk) 11:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)