GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Meetthefeebles ( talk · contribs) 18:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This has been sat in the queue for ages. I'll review. Might be tomorrow by the time I get some comments up... Meetthefeebles ( talk) 18:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Right, let's get started. As always, reviewing using
WP:WIAGA
Okay, so far so good. I'll work through by section and leave any comments below:
Lead
Club career
Overall comments
This is a well written and enjoyable article. The work is consistently referenced and most of the sources are sound (those which mightn't be are noted in the list above). My only real queries are some slight possible prose tweaks and a more substantive concern regarding breadth of coverage; whilst I appreciate that there is a fine balance to strike between c.3a of the GA criteria and a
WP:summary style, I do feel that this article is perhaps a little too sparse in some places and that whilst the article contains many salient facts and figures that alone isn't quite sufficient for 'breadth'.
That said, the other GA criteria are pretty much met here and most of the above are minor quibbles and I expect they can be resolved in reasonably short order. I'm happy to place this one on hold pending a response to the above. Meetthefeebles ( talk) 19:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A soundly written, comprehensively referenced, well-illustrated article.
I've assessed this article against the requirements of WP:WIAGA and, in the light of improvements carried out, I'm awarding GA-status. Well done! Please consider reviewing an article against the criteria. Meetthefeebles ( talk) 08:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Meetthefeebles ( talk · contribs) 18:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This has been sat in the queue for ages. I'll review. Might be tomorrow by the time I get some comments up... Meetthefeebles ( talk) 18:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Right, let's get started. As always, reviewing using
WP:WIAGA
Okay, so far so good. I'll work through by section and leave any comments below:
Lead
Club career
Overall comments
This is a well written and enjoyable article. The work is consistently referenced and most of the sources are sound (those which mightn't be are noted in the list above). My only real queries are some slight possible prose tweaks and a more substantive concern regarding breadth of coverage; whilst I appreciate that there is a fine balance to strike between c.3a of the GA criteria and a
WP:summary style, I do feel that this article is perhaps a little too sparse in some places and that whilst the article contains many salient facts and figures that alone isn't quite sufficient for 'breadth'.
That said, the other GA criteria are pretty much met here and most of the above are minor quibbles and I expect they can be resolved in reasonably short order. I'm happy to place this one on hold pending a response to the above. Meetthefeebles ( talk) 19:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A soundly written, comprehensively referenced, well-illustrated article.
I've assessed this article against the requirements of WP:WIAGA and, in the light of improvements carried out, I'm awarding GA-status. Well done! Please consider reviewing an article against the criteria. Meetthefeebles ( talk) 08:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)