This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
BetacommandBot08:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Completely new build stadium?
It may be that Rice-Eccles Stadium is not a complete new build, and if this is the case then this article should be merged with the Rice Stadium (Utah) article
Rockford1963 (
talk)
22:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I think 10 is a good number. Right now, that would mean all crowds would be 45.5 k or higher. The top 15 are listed on the
Rice鈥揈ccles Stadium webpage. So after the season is over, the University of Utah updates the page, but the wikipedia community updates it immediately with any new records. That's how we ended up with 17. But I think 10 makes more sense. 鈥
Ute in DC (
talk)
01:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)reply
A Google search of "rice eccles" shows almost every site using a hyphen, which I'm pretty sure is the proper English way of spelling it. I'm going to update the article to use hyphens instead of ndashes if no one can provide a reliable source that uses an ndash. Thatotherperson (
talk/
contribs)
14:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 3 external links on
Rice-Eccles Stadium. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The fact the technical move is contested does not mean I oppose it, only that I consider the presence of past discussions on the matter means it should not be decided unilaterally. 鈥
Fray忙 (
Talk/
Spjall)
08:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply
I do not think that the stated rationale in
搂 Rice鈥揈ccles or Rice-Eccles? (
permanent link) above is justified because it is not only grammatically incorrect, since compound eponyms like "Rice鈥揈ccles Stadium" are en-dashed according to numerous style guides,
including ours; but also the punctuation used in
reliable sources is irrelevant, at least in this situation, because the punctuation in question is a stylistic choice made by the publisher and not one that is crucial to understanding the meaning of the name. If anything, a stronger case can be made that the reliable sources and the stadium owners themselves misunderstand the punctuation of this stadium's name, since it is named after two men whose surnames were
Rice and
Eccles respectively, not a single person named Rice-Eccles (as is the case for the
Lennard-Jones potential, named after
John Lennard-Jones). 鈥
N酶kkenbuer (
talk 鈥
contribs)
23:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Support. This article title should use an endash, per our MOS. Agree with N酶kkenbuer, other sources usage of the term is irrelevant. 鈥
X96lee15 (
talk)
18:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
BetacommandBot08:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Completely new build stadium?
It may be that Rice-Eccles Stadium is not a complete new build, and if this is the case then this article should be merged with the Rice Stadium (Utah) article
Rockford1963 (
talk)
22:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I think 10 is a good number. Right now, that would mean all crowds would be 45.5 k or higher. The top 15 are listed on the
Rice鈥揈ccles Stadium webpage. So after the season is over, the University of Utah updates the page, but the wikipedia community updates it immediately with any new records. That's how we ended up with 17. But I think 10 makes more sense. 鈥
Ute in DC (
talk)
01:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)reply
A Google search of "rice eccles" shows almost every site using a hyphen, which I'm pretty sure is the proper English way of spelling it. I'm going to update the article to use hyphens instead of ndashes if no one can provide a reliable source that uses an ndash. Thatotherperson (
talk/
contribs)
14:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 3 external links on
Rice-Eccles Stadium. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The fact the technical move is contested does not mean I oppose it, only that I consider the presence of past discussions on the matter means it should not be decided unilaterally. 鈥
Fray忙 (
Talk/
Spjall)
08:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply
I do not think that the stated rationale in
搂 Rice鈥揈ccles or Rice-Eccles? (
permanent link) above is justified because it is not only grammatically incorrect, since compound eponyms like "Rice鈥揈ccles Stadium" are en-dashed according to numerous style guides,
including ours; but also the punctuation used in
reliable sources is irrelevant, at least in this situation, because the punctuation in question is a stylistic choice made by the publisher and not one that is crucial to understanding the meaning of the name. If anything, a stronger case can be made that the reliable sources and the stadium owners themselves misunderstand the punctuation of this stadium's name, since it is named after two men whose surnames were
Rice and
Eccles respectively, not a single person named Rice-Eccles (as is the case for the
Lennard-Jones potential, named after
John Lennard-Jones). 鈥
N酶kkenbuer (
talk 鈥
contribs)
23:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Support. This article title should use an endash, per our MOS. Agree with N酶kkenbuer, other sources usage of the term is irrelevant. 鈥
X96lee15 (
talk)
18:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.