GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs)
03:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
|
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. As per the above checklist, I do have some insights that I think will be useful in improving the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Ritchie333, please feel free to strike out any recommendation you think will not help in improving the article. All the best,
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
22:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Ritchie333, very much for your diligence, care and precision in writing such great articles. Promoting the article to GA status.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
22:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs)
03:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
|
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. As per the above checklist, I do have some insights that I think will be useful in improving the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Ritchie333, please feel free to strike out any recommendation you think will not help in improving the article. All the best,
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
22:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Ritchie333, very much for your diligence, care and precision in writing such great articles. Promoting the article to GA status.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥
22:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)