This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles New York (state): Hudson Valley High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

Hi. According to this, the offices for "dinotopia" are located in this town. Should it be included? Is it fantasy, and is that a reason for not including it? Should it be added to the "see also"? Thanks. A stroHur ricane 00 1^{( Talk+ Contribs+ Ubx)} 20:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Friends of Old Rhinebeck - An active web site / message board about Rhinebeck for alumni of the Rhinebeck Central School system. To visit the site, please contact Janet Post at: janet_post@myfamily.com . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk • contribs) 06:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Question over whether Chelsea Clinton should be listed among the 'Notable People', usually that section is for people that live or have lived in the area, not visited it, or had an event there, like a wedding ceremony. Believe that it either should be placed in its own section, or deleted entirely as being not on point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.44.86.135 ( talk) 03:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply