This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rhapsody (operating system) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it work mentioning the Red Box rumour? (It was a rumoured box that had a certain level of compatability with Windows. There's some speculation it may be dusted off and brought into MacOS X)
It was a rummor... There are no screen shots and little plans to make it although yellow box could be worth mentioning.
It was a widely believed rummor - although no product was made. Although it was a widely succesful rummer and should be mentionted as it generated a great deal of interest in rhapsody.-- Frozenport ( talk) 05:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm not exactly crazy about this move solely for the sake of consistency, but if it's going to be "Apple Rhapsody," can we at least get rid of the "(operating system)" now? MFNickster 22:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
No objections reported, moving... Maury 13:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
The latest stable version info in the infobox is broken. The version number is coming from the Rhapsody music service, and not the values given for Rhapsody OS. Lavenderbunny ( talk) 21:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
All of the pictures, or a reduced-resolution copy of them, would clearly have been fair use. WHAT IS WITH THE MASS DELETION OF EVERY PICTURE ON WIKIPEDIA? The destruction of content is a mortal sin; this one doubly so. FAIR USE! - 128.61.83.190 ( talk) 14:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
There is a screenshot that has been commented out. What happened? Should it be commented out? Dullbananas ( talk) 20:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rhapsody (operating system) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it work mentioning the Red Box rumour? (It was a rumoured box that had a certain level of compatability with Windows. There's some speculation it may be dusted off and brought into MacOS X)
It was a rummor... There are no screen shots and little plans to make it although yellow box could be worth mentioning.
It was a widely believed rummor - although no product was made. Although it was a widely succesful rummer and should be mentionted as it generated a great deal of interest in rhapsody.-- Frozenport ( talk) 05:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm not exactly crazy about this move solely for the sake of consistency, but if it's going to be "Apple Rhapsody," can we at least get rid of the "(operating system)" now? MFNickster 22:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
No objections reported, moving... Maury 13:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
The latest stable version info in the infobox is broken. The version number is coming from the Rhapsody music service, and not the values given for Rhapsody OS. Lavenderbunny ( talk) 21:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
All of the pictures, or a reduced-resolution copy of them, would clearly have been fair use. WHAT IS WITH THE MASS DELETION OF EVERY PICTURE ON WIKIPEDIA? The destruction of content is a mortal sin; this one doubly so. FAIR USE! - 128.61.83.190 ( talk) 14:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
There is a screenshot that has been commented out. What happened? Should it be commented out? Dullbananas ( talk) 20:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)