This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Not being a mammalogist with access to proper literature, I am not the right one to undertake such a task, but I none the less am disturbed by the fact that there seems to be no discussion of the distinction between this species and R. pumilio, either its taxonomy, history, biology, range or significance, nor any indication of how to know which one you are dealing with, nor why you shouldn't care if you cannot find out. If nothing of the kind is forthcoming, what is the article for? JonRichfield ( talk) 14:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not being a mammalogist with access to proper literature, I am not the right one to undertake such a task, but I none the less am disturbed by the fact that there seems to be no discussion of the distinction between this species and R. pumilio, either its taxonomy, history, biology, range or significance, nor any indication of how to know which one you are dealing with, nor why you shouldn't care if you cannot find out. If nothing of the kind is forthcoming, what is the article for? JonRichfield ( talk) 14:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)