From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this article functional?

Not being a mammalogist with access to proper literature, I am not the right one to undertake such a task, but I none the less am disturbed by the fact that there seems to be no discussion of the distinction between this species and R. pumilio, either its taxonomy, history, biology, range or significance, nor any indication of how to know which one you are dealing with, nor why you shouldn't care if you cannot find out. If nothing of the kind is forthcoming, what is the article for? JonRichfield ( talk) 14:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this article functional?

Not being a mammalogist with access to proper literature, I am not the right one to undertake such a task, but I none the less am disturbed by the fact that there seems to be no discussion of the distinction between this species and R. pumilio, either its taxonomy, history, biology, range or significance, nor any indication of how to know which one you are dealing with, nor why you shouldn't care if you cannot find out. If nothing of the kind is forthcoming, what is the article for? JonRichfield ( talk) 14:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook