This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
doi:10.1177/0885066611402150 - JICM doi:10.1378/chest.12-2016 - Chest
Two reviews that might warrant inclusion. JFW | T@lk 20:58, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Seppi333 added a link to a Toxnet monograph about niacin. Currently, the article does not have individual references for each agent known to cause rhadbomyolysis, because the list of items would be extremely long and the methodology of each individual report is often extremely weak. The current solution (using only secondary sources, and try to include only those causes that are mentioned in multiple sources and are very well recognised) has worked well for a long time, and I am reluctant to deviate from it. I hope this makes sense. JFW | T@lk 22:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Adding it as a fourth ref does not make sense since we already have three good refs. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Critical Care has an updated review on rhabdomyolysis doi:10.1186/cc13897. I will need to see if it contains anything novel. JFW | T@lk 15:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I had missed this, but the Cochrane review from last year ( doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008566.pub2) could not confirm a mortality benefit with CVVH due to low numbers in the studies. I wonder how we should discuss that in the article. JFW | T@lk 16:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Review doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1314-5 JFW | T@lk 23:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
"If the swelling is very rapid, as may happen after someone is released from under a collapsed building"
This is the stupidest analogy I can imagine. Nice work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.99.158 ( talk) 19:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Tell us how you really feel... 2600:1700:4CA1:3C80:ED78:EA7D:6EE1:95DA ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:05, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
doi:10.1177/0885066611402150 - JICM doi:10.1378/chest.12-2016 - Chest
Two reviews that might warrant inclusion. JFW | T@lk 20:58, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Seppi333 added a link to a Toxnet monograph about niacin. Currently, the article does not have individual references for each agent known to cause rhadbomyolysis, because the list of items would be extremely long and the methodology of each individual report is often extremely weak. The current solution (using only secondary sources, and try to include only those causes that are mentioned in multiple sources and are very well recognised) has worked well for a long time, and I am reluctant to deviate from it. I hope this makes sense. JFW | T@lk 22:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Adding it as a fourth ref does not make sense since we already have three good refs. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Critical Care has an updated review on rhabdomyolysis doi:10.1186/cc13897. I will need to see if it contains anything novel. JFW | T@lk 15:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I had missed this, but the Cochrane review from last year ( doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008566.pub2) could not confirm a mortality benefit with CVVH due to low numbers in the studies. I wonder how we should discuss that in the article. JFW | T@lk 16:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Review doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1314-5 JFW | T@lk 23:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
"If the swelling is very rapid, as may happen after someone is released from under a collapsed building"
This is the stupidest analogy I can imagine. Nice work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.99.158 ( talk) 19:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Tell us how you really feel... 2600:1700:4CA1:3C80:ED78:EA7D:6EE1:95DA ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:05, 24 November 2018 (UTC)