The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 1989 expulsion of Turks from Bulgaria was copied or moved into Revival Process on 14 August 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
There's no point of having two articles talking about the same thing. Revival Process is just a subset of Bulgarisation. غسان السقاف ( talk) 11:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I removed the reference to "Slavic" names to account for acceptable "Bulgarian" names under the policy which are neither Slavic nor Christian (Dimitar, Georgi, Hristina...) – such as " Krum" or " Asparuh". There are also popular Bulgarian names of pre-Christian Hellenic origin (Alexander, Filip etc). The only common denominator of names that were assigned under Bulgarisation appears to be that they just don't convey allegiance to Turkic or Muslim identities. Planetdust ( talk) 10:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Based on a detailed comparison of the articles "Big Excursion" and "Revival Process," here are the key points and recommendations:
To address the duplication and effectively introduce summary style, consider the following approach:
The duplication notice is still applicable as there is significant overlap between the two articles. By following the recommendations to merge overlapping content and introduce summary style, you can ensure that each article remains focused and informative without unnecessary duplication. This approach will enhance the clarity and coherence of both articles. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 21:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 1989 expulsion of Turks from Bulgaria was copied or moved into Revival Process on 14 August 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
There's no point of having two articles talking about the same thing. Revival Process is just a subset of Bulgarisation. غسان السقاف ( talk) 11:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I removed the reference to "Slavic" names to account for acceptable "Bulgarian" names under the policy which are neither Slavic nor Christian (Dimitar, Georgi, Hristina...) – such as " Krum" or " Asparuh". There are also popular Bulgarian names of pre-Christian Hellenic origin (Alexander, Filip etc). The only common denominator of names that were assigned under Bulgarisation appears to be that they just don't convey allegiance to Turkic or Muslim identities. Planetdust ( talk) 10:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Based on a detailed comparison of the articles "Big Excursion" and "Revival Process," here are the key points and recommendations:
To address the duplication and effectively introduce summary style, consider the following approach:
The duplication notice is still applicable as there is significant overlap between the two articles. By following the recommendations to merge overlapping content and introduce summary style, you can ensure that each article remains focused and informative without unnecessary duplication. This approach will enhance the clarity and coherence of both articles. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 21:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)