From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply


Taking a look now....you know the drill... Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A nice read overall. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 06:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: - just minor quibbles really. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 06:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi Cas, thanks for the review. Do you mind giving me a couple days to have a chance to look at these points/changes? Should be less than a week. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 06:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply
no problemo Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 11:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi Cas, I've answered all of the above, although some of the points I haven't actioned.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 19:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Forgot the ping. Casliber, I've addressed the above. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 13:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply

all Good.... Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 14:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply


Taking a look now....you know the drill... Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A nice read overall. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 06:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: - just minor quibbles really. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 06:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi Cas, thanks for the review. Do you mind giving me a couple days to have a chance to look at these points/changes? Should be less than a week. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 06:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply
no problemo Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 11:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi Cas, I've answered all of the above, although some of the points I haven't actioned.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 19:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Forgot the ping. Casliber, I've addressed the above. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 13:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply

all Good.... Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 14:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook