Restoration of the Everglades is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restoration of the Everglades is part of the Everglades series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 8, 2009. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Now as far as I was aware, the Melaleuca species in question was only the one, Melaleuca quinquenervia, so best to just use the species name in the article (?) I may be wrong on this though. Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:Restoration of the Everglades/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. I am reviewing this page and will post detailed comments shortly. I am also fixing typos and minor copyedits. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
OK, here we go. Because of the article’s length I am commenting in stages. This first bite takes us to the end of "Everglades Forever"
First impression: I am very impressed by the amount of detailed information that as been gathered for this article. Because of its somewhat technical nature, great care needs to be taken with organization and presentation, and with explanation and linking of unfamiliar terms. There are some problems with fluency, and I have made several suggestions as to how some awkwardnesses might be overcome. It is possible that some of my points will have been raised and dealt with at the concurrent peer review.
Comments on remaining sections will follow. Here, indeed, is more
I'm forgetting to sign these comments. Remaining sections soon. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Last 3 sections
This was a good learning experience for me - something I knew nothing about, now I know something. Although my review list looks long, you will see that most are pretty trivial points - rewordings, clarifications, request for links etc. I see no major impediments to promotion, but I'll look at it again after your responses to these. Good wishes Brianboulton ( talk) 18:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Brianboulton ( talk) 23:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 2, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.
Brianboulton ( talk) 07:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I am no expert on images, but I took a quick look at all of images to look for obvious problems:
The rest look good to me! Awadewit ( talk) 00:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I would have thought the she-oaks gained a guernsey here, namely [1], [2]
for the lovely Casuarina equisetifolia, Casuarina glauca and Casuarina cunninghamiana....Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 03:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
That's all I have! Awadewit ( talk) 16:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Pursuant to your question here regarding the McCain issue, I'm not seeing any WP:UNDUE problems here. You present both candidates' quotes on the matter and there is only one paragraph on them in a much broader article that explains the context for their views, so I think we are fine. What does everyone else think? Awadewit ( talk) 16:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I just want to provide this recent article since it relates to this article. Not sure if there is any updating necessary, just trying to keep editors here informed, sorry if you already knew this - [3] NancyHeise ( talk) 00:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Numbers like "25%" make me suspicious; has it really been measured as less than 26% and more than 24% (if indeed the original area of the Everglades can be stated to two significant digits) or did someone think the mere two syllables of "one-fourth" undignified? — Tamfang ( talk) 22:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm interested in adding some text to describe a series of reports from the U.S. National Research Council that review the progress of the CERP (more information here http://dels.nas.edu/search). I'm also proposing adding the same text on the main Everglades page--let me know if I should edit the version that appears here, or perhaps only add this in one place.
Any feedback would be appreciated. Best wishes, Earlgrey101 ( talk) 15:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Restoration of the Everglades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Restoration of the Everglades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Restoration of the Everglades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced content, lack of updating since 2008/2009. ( t · c) buidhe 05:34, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Restoration of the Everglades is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restoration of the Everglades is part of the Everglades series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 8, 2009. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Now as far as I was aware, the Melaleuca species in question was only the one, Melaleuca quinquenervia, so best to just use the species name in the article (?) I may be wrong on this though. Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:Restoration of the Everglades/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. I am reviewing this page and will post detailed comments shortly. I am also fixing typos and minor copyedits. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
OK, here we go. Because of the article’s length I am commenting in stages. This first bite takes us to the end of "Everglades Forever"
First impression: I am very impressed by the amount of detailed information that as been gathered for this article. Because of its somewhat technical nature, great care needs to be taken with organization and presentation, and with explanation and linking of unfamiliar terms. There are some problems with fluency, and I have made several suggestions as to how some awkwardnesses might be overcome. It is possible that some of my points will have been raised and dealt with at the concurrent peer review.
Comments on remaining sections will follow. Here, indeed, is more
I'm forgetting to sign these comments. Remaining sections soon. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Last 3 sections
This was a good learning experience for me - something I knew nothing about, now I know something. Although my review list looks long, you will see that most are pretty trivial points - rewordings, clarifications, request for links etc. I see no major impediments to promotion, but I'll look at it again after your responses to these. Good wishes Brianboulton ( talk) 18:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Brianboulton ( talk) 23:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 2, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.
Brianboulton ( talk) 07:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I am no expert on images, but I took a quick look at all of images to look for obvious problems:
The rest look good to me! Awadewit ( talk) 00:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I would have thought the she-oaks gained a guernsey here, namely [1], [2]
for the lovely Casuarina equisetifolia, Casuarina glauca and Casuarina cunninghamiana....Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 03:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
That's all I have! Awadewit ( talk) 16:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Pursuant to your question here regarding the McCain issue, I'm not seeing any WP:UNDUE problems here. You present both candidates' quotes on the matter and there is only one paragraph on them in a much broader article that explains the context for their views, so I think we are fine. What does everyone else think? Awadewit ( talk) 16:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I just want to provide this recent article since it relates to this article. Not sure if there is any updating necessary, just trying to keep editors here informed, sorry if you already knew this - [3] NancyHeise ( talk) 00:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Numbers like "25%" make me suspicious; has it really been measured as less than 26% and more than 24% (if indeed the original area of the Everglades can be stated to two significant digits) or did someone think the mere two syllables of "one-fourth" undignified? — Tamfang ( talk) 22:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm interested in adding some text to describe a series of reports from the U.S. National Research Council that review the progress of the CERP (more information here http://dels.nas.edu/search). I'm also proposing adding the same text on the main Everglades page--let me know if I should edit the version that appears here, or perhaps only add this in one place.
Any feedback would be appreciated. Best wishes, Earlgrey101 ( talk) 15:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Restoration of the Everglades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Restoration of the Everglades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Restoration of the Everglades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced content, lack of updating since 2008/2009. ( t · c) buidhe 05:34, 22 November 2022 (UTC)