![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This is nothing to do with "Philosophy" (sic). It is an interlinked piece of self-publicity for the a book.The book, itself, is a collage of self-help cliches presented as if it were something significant or original. Wikipedia, in this instance, is a complicit promoter of the author and his book. - 86.157.215.120
I recently found a number of sources covered in the media about Pressfield's philosophy. I am willing to discuss this page further. I created this a few years ago when I was a newbie editor. DaltonCastle ( talk) 03:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
I was expecting a bit more Foucault and Scott... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.195.104.67 ( talk) 22:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This is nothing to do with "Philosophy" (sic). It is an interlinked piece of self-publicity for the a book.The book, itself, is a collage of self-help cliches presented as if it were something significant or original. Wikipedia, in this instance, is a complicit promoter of the author and his book. - 86.157.215.120
I recently found a number of sources covered in the media about Pressfield's philosophy. I am willing to discuss this page further. I created this a few years ago when I was a newbie editor. DaltonCastle ( talk) 03:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
I was expecting a bit more Foucault and Scott... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.195.104.67 ( talk) 22:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)