Daily page views
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Research on Inuit clothing has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Research on Inuit clothing is part of the Inuit clothing series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 30, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
research on Inuit clothing began with detailed images of Inuit people produced by Europeans as early as the 1560s? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Vaticidalprophet ( talk · contribs) 10:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Image notes:
The images themselves are good, but I might want to recommend moving some around. The lead has no images, while two of those currently in the article chop up sections a little. Right now, I'm inclined to suggest moving File:Inuk Woman (6819810943).jpg to the lead, as it's a nice, eye-catching image that's currently a bit awkwardly placed halfway through a section break. Vaticidal prophet 09:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Putting this and my other current review on 2O because I am clearly somewhere between grudgingly tolerated and actively unwanted on Wikipedia, and I should at least clear my head a bit and drop current obligations. Vaticidal prophet 10:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hiya :). I'll be giving a second opinion / finish the review. (opt) means I don't consider it part of the GA criteria. Article looks good!
FemkeMilene (
talk) 07:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Prose:
Accessibility
Source
Other:
The result was: promoted by
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 10:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Premeditated Chaos ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC).
Daily page views
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Research on Inuit clothing has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Research on Inuit clothing is part of the Inuit clothing series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 30, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
research on Inuit clothing began with detailed images of Inuit people produced by Europeans as early as the 1560s? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Vaticidalprophet ( talk · contribs) 10:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Image notes:
The images themselves are good, but I might want to recommend moving some around. The lead has no images, while two of those currently in the article chop up sections a little. Right now, I'm inclined to suggest moving File:Inuk Woman (6819810943).jpg to the lead, as it's a nice, eye-catching image that's currently a bit awkwardly placed halfway through a section break. Vaticidal prophet 09:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Putting this and my other current review on 2O because I am clearly somewhere between grudgingly tolerated and actively unwanted on Wikipedia, and I should at least clear my head a bit and drop current obligations. Vaticidal prophet 10:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hiya :). I'll be giving a second opinion / finish the review. (opt) means I don't consider it part of the GA criteria. Article looks good!
FemkeMilene (
talk) 07:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Prose:
Accessibility
Source
Other:
The result was: promoted by
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 10:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Premeditated Chaos ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC).