From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
K.e.coffman (
talk ·
contribs) 01:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
I will start on this shortly. --
K.e.coffman (
talk) 01:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I did a light copy-edit. I don't have any concerns about the article and am thus passing it for GA.
- Assessment against GA criteria
-
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: