This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renewable energy in the Philippines article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello. I have seen that during your major copyedit you practically reverted my edits without notice. Links should be present only at the first occurrence of a word in an article, see WP:links. The lead is again too short and does not summarize the article, see WP:lead. So please before reverting edits without notice open a discussion on the talk page. Moreover, removing entire sections should be also firstly discussed. -- Ita140188 ( talk) 10:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2022 and 25 April 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Yamcosh (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Tntle.
Here is my edit: User:Yamcosh/Renewable energy in the Philippines Yamcosh ( talk) 01:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Article currently lists Pulangi Dam and Magat Dam as run-of-the-river. This is greenspeak. Both use large dams.
The problem with both this and the articles on those schemes and also the run-of-the-river article itself is that there are published sources that allow run-of-the-river schemes to have pondage of whatever size. Using and citing these POV sources in a way that keeps Wikipedia both comprehensive and NPOV is not a trivial task. Andrewa ( talk) 16:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renewable energy in the Philippines article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello. I have seen that during your major copyedit you practically reverted my edits without notice. Links should be present only at the first occurrence of a word in an article, see WP:links. The lead is again too short and does not summarize the article, see WP:lead. So please before reverting edits without notice open a discussion on the talk page. Moreover, removing entire sections should be also firstly discussed. -- Ita140188 ( talk) 10:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2022 and 25 April 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Yamcosh (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Tntle.
Here is my edit: User:Yamcosh/Renewable energy in the Philippines Yamcosh ( talk) 01:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Article currently lists Pulangi Dam and Magat Dam as run-of-the-river. This is greenspeak. Both use large dams.
The problem with both this and the articles on those schemes and also the run-of-the-river article itself is that there are published sources that allow run-of-the-river schemes to have pondage of whatever size. Using and citing these POV sources in a way that keeps Wikipedia both comprehensive and NPOV is not a trivial task. Andrewa ( talk) 16:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)