This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renaissance magic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jnhkb4,
Jtm7dd. Peer reviewers:
Bahm9d,
Nooneisnotthere.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 08:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
just a scratchpad so far; could be extended into a full-length article. Should maybe be extended to include Baroque, a full 150 years that at present fall between the cracks in the main article. dab (𒁳) 09:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
@ Dbachmann: I've expanded the Renaissance material into a full-length article. I've moved the list of Baroque magicians to Magic (supernatural) for now, until a standalone article can be created from it. Skyerise ( talk) 23:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Are there any plans to actually go through, add proper citations and flesh out the articles content? It appears that there is are a lot of sources and ideas that could be blown up. Such as delving specifically into the individual types of magic (such as geomancy) for this time period. Jtm7dd ( talk) 17:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
I am adding brief sections to explain each type of magic during the renaissance period. Jtm7dd ( talk) 16:22, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renaissance magic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jnhkb4,
Jtm7dd. Peer reviewers:
Bahm9d,
Nooneisnotthere.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 08:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
just a scratchpad so far; could be extended into a full-length article. Should maybe be extended to include Baroque, a full 150 years that at present fall between the cracks in the main article. dab (𒁳) 09:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
@ Dbachmann: I've expanded the Renaissance material into a full-length article. I've moved the list of Baroque magicians to Magic (supernatural) for now, until a standalone article can be created from it. Skyerise ( talk) 23:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Are there any plans to actually go through, add proper citations and flesh out the articles content? It appears that there is are a lot of sources and ideas that could be blown up. Such as delving specifically into the individual types of magic (such as geomancy) for this time period. Jtm7dd ( talk) 17:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
I am adding brief sections to explain each type of magic during the renaissance period. Jtm7dd ( talk) 16:22, 6 April 2018 (UTC)