![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Favonian - Why did you remove the IVF-Global Perspective - Religious link? I agree it's not comprehensive but it seems reasonably sources and has more information than currently exists in the article. Specifically regarding eastern religions. Give it some thought and maybe change it back. (or find a different source for that info and add it into the article. Joe407 ( talk) 11:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I added a section addressing the views of the Conservative Jewish movement. As I was writing it it occurred to me that while the rest of this article deals with ART specifically, we may need either to change the article to "Religious response to infertility" and address the broader topic, or create a new article dealing with the broader question. For now, I'm going to leave my addition where it is and see what people say. Any thoughts? Joe407 ( talk) 06:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I propose to spell out the abbreviation in the title as well. Presently it is spelled out in the lede, which suggests the same should be done in the title. Although I know the subject matter as a rabbi, I had no idea what ART stood for until I saw the lede. A clear indication that the abbreviation should be spelled out. Debresser ( talk) 10:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Here is an article that may give more information for the section on Catholicism. http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=807 I don't know quite enough and I'd appreciate if someone more knowledgeable than myself could see if there is anything valuable in the article. Joe407 ( talk) 09:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
After seeing some articles ( like this for example) dealing with religious positions on donor material, I'm thinking of adding a section to this article. Can people post additional articles regarding religious views on donor (sperm & egg)? Joe407 ( talk) 10:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
The birth of Duryodhana, a mythical character is Hindu Mythology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duryodhana#Birth involved the sealing of balls of flesh in a pot of ghee. This was sanctioned and supervised by religious heads.
Would it be appropriate to include this in a section that talks about Religious response to ART? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.175.79 ( talk) 23:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
for supervision and support for infertile couples: http://www.puahonline.org/, http://atime.org/ Book for couples experiencing infertility: Finkelstein, Baruch and Michal: The Third Key. The Jewish Couple's Guide to Fertility. Feldheim.
I'm new to Wikipedia and not sure if I'm allowed to cite the websites, also my English is not good enough. Maybe someone else can work with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninniele ( talk • contribs) 22:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Religious response to assisted reproductive technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Favonian - Why did you remove the IVF-Global Perspective - Religious link? I agree it's not comprehensive but it seems reasonably sources and has more information than currently exists in the article. Specifically regarding eastern religions. Give it some thought and maybe change it back. (or find a different source for that info and add it into the article. Joe407 ( talk) 11:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I added a section addressing the views of the Conservative Jewish movement. As I was writing it it occurred to me that while the rest of this article deals with ART specifically, we may need either to change the article to "Religious response to infertility" and address the broader topic, or create a new article dealing with the broader question. For now, I'm going to leave my addition where it is and see what people say. Any thoughts? Joe407 ( talk) 06:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I propose to spell out the abbreviation in the title as well. Presently it is spelled out in the lede, which suggests the same should be done in the title. Although I know the subject matter as a rabbi, I had no idea what ART stood for until I saw the lede. A clear indication that the abbreviation should be spelled out. Debresser ( talk) 10:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Here is an article that may give more information for the section on Catholicism. http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=807 I don't know quite enough and I'd appreciate if someone more knowledgeable than myself could see if there is anything valuable in the article. Joe407 ( talk) 09:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
After seeing some articles ( like this for example) dealing with religious positions on donor material, I'm thinking of adding a section to this article. Can people post additional articles regarding religious views on donor (sperm & egg)? Joe407 ( talk) 10:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
The birth of Duryodhana, a mythical character is Hindu Mythology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duryodhana#Birth involved the sealing of balls of flesh in a pot of ghee. This was sanctioned and supervised by religious heads.
Would it be appropriate to include this in a section that talks about Religious response to ART? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.175.79 ( talk) 23:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
for supervision and support for infertile couples: http://www.puahonline.org/, http://atime.org/ Book for couples experiencing infertility: Finkelstein, Baruch and Michal: The Third Key. The Jewish Couple's Guide to Fertility. Feldheim.
I'm new to Wikipedia and not sure if I'm allowed to cite the websites, also my English is not good enough. Maybe someone else can work with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninniele ( talk • contribs) 22:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Religious response to assisted reproductive technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)