This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following was moved here from the article:
I invite the author of this statement to improve the article accordingly. BD2412 T 05:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
It is odd that an article on the "Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act" does not at least quote pertinent passages from the law, or else present a lengthy and scholarly summary of this Act of Congress.
It is patently silly to instantly jump into a description of legal cases concerning the many disagreements about what this Act means -- without first stating what the law says, at least in a summary form.
I suggest that you take a look at the articles on the various Amendments to the Federal Constitution (for example, the 1st, 13th, 14th, and 15th). First and foremost in those articles is a word-for-word quotation of what the Amendment says, and next they delve into the implications of the Amendments, and the court cases that have interpreted the Amendments. This is the logical way to proceed in such articles. 98.67.173.16 ( talk) 22:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I found this as a section heading:
I changed it to this:
Most of the section headings in this article made the same mistake. Surprisingly, this persisted while numerous people edited this article over several years. Please notice that WP:MOS does exist, and other Wikipedia articles exist, and most of them follow the standard prescribed in WP:MOS. 174.53.163.119 ( talk) 14:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Bernards Township, New Jersey#Islamic Society of Basking Ridge. -- Jeremyb ( talk) 16:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following was moved here from the article:
I invite the author of this statement to improve the article accordingly. BD2412 T 05:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
It is odd that an article on the "Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act" does not at least quote pertinent passages from the law, or else present a lengthy and scholarly summary of this Act of Congress.
It is patently silly to instantly jump into a description of legal cases concerning the many disagreements about what this Act means -- without first stating what the law says, at least in a summary form.
I suggest that you take a look at the articles on the various Amendments to the Federal Constitution (for example, the 1st, 13th, 14th, and 15th). First and foremost in those articles is a word-for-word quotation of what the Amendment says, and next they delve into the implications of the Amendments, and the court cases that have interpreted the Amendments. This is the logical way to proceed in such articles. 98.67.173.16 ( talk) 22:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I found this as a section heading:
I changed it to this:
Most of the section headings in this article made the same mistake. Surprisingly, this persisted while numerous people edited this article over several years. Please notice that WP:MOS does exist, and other Wikipedia articles exist, and most of them follow the standard prescribed in WP:MOS. 174.53.163.119 ( talk) 14:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Bernards Township, New Jersey#Islamic Society of Basking Ridge. -- Jeremyb ( talk) 16:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)