This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Relativistic programming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article looks like trolling.
I don’t know if there is something like “relativistic programming” the only source for the article is not using the word relativistic programming and there is no reference to the theory of relativity.
The use of “over 9000” sounds like trolling and while it is true that the graph in the source shows a value over 8000 extrapolating it to over 9000 is extremely subjective. -- Albert Dice ( talk) 10:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a real technique for dealing with concurrency issues but it has absolutely nothing to do with relativity in the physics sense the references to that in this article make no sense. Causality violations would make partial order imposition impossible as behavior wouldn't converge.
I'm not sure that this rises to the level of a programming style, it's just a restating of this: /info/en/?search=Non-blocking_algorithm
There's a reasonable argument to be made that the sole citation that makes sense here should just be added to the non-blocking page as a citation and this page should probably be merged into that one and deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.4.182.14 ( talk) 20:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Relativistic programming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article looks like trolling.
I don’t know if there is something like “relativistic programming” the only source for the article is not using the word relativistic programming and there is no reference to the theory of relativity.
The use of “over 9000” sounds like trolling and while it is true that the graph in the source shows a value over 8000 extrapolating it to over 9000 is extremely subjective. -- Albert Dice ( talk) 10:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a real technique for dealing with concurrency issues but it has absolutely nothing to do with relativity in the physics sense the references to that in this article make no sense. Causality violations would make partial order imposition impossible as behavior wouldn't converge.
I'm not sure that this rises to the level of a programming style, it's just a restating of this: /info/en/?search=Non-blocking_algorithm
There's a reasonable argument to be made that the sole citation that makes sense here should just be added to the non-blocking page as a citation and this page should probably be merged into that one and deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.4.182.14 ( talk) 20:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)