![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Regulation of artificial intelligence was copied or moved into Regulation of algorithms. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Geysirhead The only WP:RS I can find on "regulation of algorithms" as an umbrella term, are the [1] link already in the document and "An FDA for algorithms" 'Tutt, Andrew. "An FDA for algorithms." Admin. L. Rev. 69 (2017): 83.'. IMHO recommend deletion unless and until the term "regulation of algorithms" gains greater usage. It would be better to focus effort on improving the existing pages on related topics (again IMHO). Rolf H Nelson ( talk) 18:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
... So, delete or not delete?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.201.3 ( talk • contribs) Not delete. Rolf H Nelson ( talk) 03:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
The Algorithmic Justice League, proposes a regulation of algorithms, to mitigate the harms and biases of AI, by promoting 4 core principles.
"
" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.201.3 ( talk • contribs)
The Regulation of AI is not a synonym for "regulation of algorithms", because AI algorithms are only a small subset of all algorithms. In general the AI algorithm is used to implement an intelligent agent to replace a human in a subjective judgement.
By other hand "non intelligent" algorithms can be viewed as a formal step-by-step transformation of law into a software. The first step is to translate "free text" law into something like Legal XML or HTML+RDFa markup... So, in this context "Regulation of algorithms" is a set of standards (including text formats/markups), and rules about when is valid to transform some formalized law in to software, when not.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.201.3 ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
Add to the end of the first paragraph under the implementation section:
There are many concerns that there is not enough visibility and monitoring of AI in these sectors. [1] In the financial sector, for example, there have been calls for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to more closely examine source code and algorithms when conducting audits of financial institutions' non-public data. [2]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cf2022 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, December 21, 2020 (UTC)
References
Cf2022 ( talk) 04:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Cf2022
/info/en/?search=The_Social_Dilemma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:6600:592:516E:FC4F:6E52:B4F7 ( talk) 21:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Regulation of artificial intelligence was copied or moved into Regulation of algorithms. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Geysirhead The only WP:RS I can find on "regulation of algorithms" as an umbrella term, are the [1] link already in the document and "An FDA for algorithms" 'Tutt, Andrew. "An FDA for algorithms." Admin. L. Rev. 69 (2017): 83.'. IMHO recommend deletion unless and until the term "regulation of algorithms" gains greater usage. It would be better to focus effort on improving the existing pages on related topics (again IMHO). Rolf H Nelson ( talk) 18:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
... So, delete or not delete?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.201.3 ( talk • contribs) Not delete. Rolf H Nelson ( talk) 03:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
The Algorithmic Justice League, proposes a regulation of algorithms, to mitigate the harms and biases of AI, by promoting 4 core principles.
"
" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.201.3 ( talk • contribs)
The Regulation of AI is not a synonym for "regulation of algorithms", because AI algorithms are only a small subset of all algorithms. In general the AI algorithm is used to implement an intelligent agent to replace a human in a subjective judgement.
By other hand "non intelligent" algorithms can be viewed as a formal step-by-step transformation of law into a software. The first step is to translate "free text" law into something like Legal XML or HTML+RDFa markup... So, in this context "Regulation of algorithms" is a set of standards (including text formats/markups), and rules about when is valid to transform some formalized law in to software, when not.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.201.3 ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
Add to the end of the first paragraph under the implementation section:
There are many concerns that there is not enough visibility and monitoring of AI in these sectors. [1] In the financial sector, for example, there have been calls for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to more closely examine source code and algorithms when conducting audits of financial institutions' non-public data. [2]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cf2022 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, December 21, 2020 (UTC)
References
Cf2022 ( talk) 04:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Cf2022
/info/en/?search=The_Social_Dilemma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:6600:592:516E:FC4F:6E52:B4F7 ( talk) 21:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)