This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Here's a map with the five regions. This article would benefit from a map like that. I have no idea why the Federal District is colored differently from the rest of the First Region. A.Z. 20:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
What should the name of this article be? Should it be Regional Federal Courts, or Federal Regional Courts (or something else)? The name in Portuguese is pt:Tribunais Regionais Federais (singular:Tribunal Regional Federal).
This article has been named Regional Federal Courts since it was created by (now indeffed) user in 2007. The TRF is defined in the Brazilian Constitution in article 107 (Title IV), and in the English version of the Constitution released by the Chamber of Deputies of Brazil, it is called the "Federal Regional Courts" (section IV, p. 101). Both names appear on the web, with RFC ( 4,320) slightly over FRC ( 3,900), but that is too close to call, especially with the problems inherent in interpreting search engine tallies. In google scholar, we have 182 FRC and 123 RFC, with probably a higher validity to the comparison, both due to the difference, as well as the quality of sources. In books, if we compare FRC and RFC, the first page of results for each, shows 10 FRC to 7 RFC, and the second page shows 7 FRC to 4 RFC; from the 3rd page on, there are no bolded search terms in the result snippets.
Based on the official name in the English version of the Consititution, and the preponderance of results in books and scholarly articles, I believe the title should be changed to Federal Regional Courts. Mathglot ( talk) 07:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved.
TompaDompa has proposed this move for a technical reason and has confirmed below that they have no opinion. The other two editors involved in the discussion now concur in opposing the move. There is therefore a consensus not to move. ( non-admin closure) Havelock Jones ( talk) 18:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Regional Federal Courts → Federal Regional Courts – Cleanup of Template:Disputed title, which is currently at WP:TfD. This was the proposed new title. TompaDompa ( talk) 15:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 03:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Here's a map with the five regions. This article would benefit from a map like that. I have no idea why the Federal District is colored differently from the rest of the First Region. A.Z. 20:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
What should the name of this article be? Should it be Regional Federal Courts, or Federal Regional Courts (or something else)? The name in Portuguese is pt:Tribunais Regionais Federais (singular:Tribunal Regional Federal).
This article has been named Regional Federal Courts since it was created by (now indeffed) user in 2007. The TRF is defined in the Brazilian Constitution in article 107 (Title IV), and in the English version of the Constitution released by the Chamber of Deputies of Brazil, it is called the "Federal Regional Courts" (section IV, p. 101). Both names appear on the web, with RFC ( 4,320) slightly over FRC ( 3,900), but that is too close to call, especially with the problems inherent in interpreting search engine tallies. In google scholar, we have 182 FRC and 123 RFC, with probably a higher validity to the comparison, both due to the difference, as well as the quality of sources. In books, if we compare FRC and RFC, the first page of results for each, shows 10 FRC to 7 RFC, and the second page shows 7 FRC to 4 RFC; from the 3rd page on, there are no bolded search terms in the result snippets.
Based on the official name in the English version of the Consititution, and the preponderance of results in books and scholarly articles, I believe the title should be changed to Federal Regional Courts. Mathglot ( talk) 07:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved.
TompaDompa has proposed this move for a technical reason and has confirmed below that they have no opinion. The other two editors involved in the discussion now concur in opposing the move. There is therefore a consensus not to move. ( non-admin closure) Havelock Jones ( talk) 18:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Regional Federal Courts → Federal Regional Courts – Cleanup of Template:Disputed title, which is currently at WP:TfD. This was the proposed new title. TompaDompa ( talk) 15:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 03:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)