Redbirds–Sounds rivalry has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	Redbirds–Sounds rivalry is part of the Nashville Sounds series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 13, 2020 Good article nominee Listed March 1, 2020 Featured topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Baseball Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tennessee Low‑importance Redbirds–Sounds rivalry is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Redbirds–Sounds rivalry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack ( talk · contribs) 13:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

I'll take this one, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack ( talk) 13:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

• "Head-to-head games". More of a query, are there any other type of matches? Would games not suffice?
• "knotted the record at an even 22 games apiece", is knotted a common term in baseball? I can't say I've ever heard it myself in this context but that could be a British/American thing.
  • I changed both to more common terms. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 19:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

• Could perhaps link ejected to Ejection (sports).
  • Done. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 19:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

• "the Nashville Sounds joined the Triple-A Pacific Coast League", I'd add (PCL) after this first mention as its used in the following sentence without explanation.
  • Done. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 19:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

• References from Newspapers.com will need the url-access=subscription field to notify users that it lies behind a paywall. A via=Newspapers.com would be worth including also I would say.
  • I added "|via=Newspapers.com", but I'm not sure the paywall needs to be noted because I don't think it is behind a paywall. All of the Newspapers.com links are to clippings which can be freely viewed by anyone. I logged out of my account and checked. I can add the "url-access" field if needed, but it doesn't appear to be needed. Let me know. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 19:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Overall, a high quality article. Very little to bring up, this is basically ready for promotion but I'll place it on hold for now while the points above addressed. Kosack ( talk) 18:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Kosack: I've made several changes as noted above. I have one question about the Newspapers.com links which may still need to be addressed. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 19:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

You live and learn! I never knew the clippings were freely available. If they are, then there is no need for the subscription field. I'll take a quick go through again tomorrow but don't forsee any other issues. Kosack ( talk) 22:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

I can't see anything else to quibble over on another run through. Happy to promote this, nice work. Kosack ( talk) 13:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC) reply