|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Is "endangered subspecies" acceptable? Booger-mike ( talk) 20:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Some well-meaning but functionally incommunicado (because dynamic) IP has repeatedly been trying to add information about newly released individuals, without providing any sources [1]. I've been able to find one thing - a Red Wolf Coalition press release [2] - which only verifies part of that insertion. Anyone got an angle on the rest? -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 15:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I propose that the debate on the taxonomic classification of the red wolf is over, and that the taxobox should be changed from reading Canis lupus rufus to Canis rufus. Those who know me on this page over the years also know that I have upheld both classifications. My reasoning is as follows:
Therefore, the article should be amended appropriately. I propose (1) that the taxobox reflect Canis rufus, (2) Canis rufus to appear alone in the lede sentence or (3) Canis rufus to appear before Canis lupus rufus in the lede sentence. I shall wait one week for comments. Ping to long-term interested parties: Jts1882, Elmidae, Mariomassone, and Oknazevad William Harris (talk) 21:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Are these canids a seperate species, a subspecies or hybrid? 24.150.121.149 ( talk) 00:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
The are mistaken references to Canada in the article. 70.55.15.131 ( talk) 03:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Is "endangered subspecies" acceptable? Booger-mike ( talk) 20:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Some well-meaning but functionally incommunicado (because dynamic) IP has repeatedly been trying to add information about newly released individuals, without providing any sources [1]. I've been able to find one thing - a Red Wolf Coalition press release [2] - which only verifies part of that insertion. Anyone got an angle on the rest? -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 15:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I propose that the debate on the taxonomic classification of the red wolf is over, and that the taxobox should be changed from reading Canis lupus rufus to Canis rufus. Those who know me on this page over the years also know that I have upheld both classifications. My reasoning is as follows:
Therefore, the article should be amended appropriately. I propose (1) that the taxobox reflect Canis rufus, (2) Canis rufus to appear alone in the lede sentence or (3) Canis rufus to appear before Canis lupus rufus in the lede sentence. I shall wait one week for comments. Ping to long-term interested parties: Jts1882, Elmidae, Mariomassone, and Oknazevad William Harris (talk) 21:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Are these canids a seperate species, a subspecies or hybrid? 24.150.121.149 ( talk) 00:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
The are mistaken references to Canada in the article. 70.55.15.131 ( talk) 03:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)