This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tokusatsu This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tokusatsu, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tokusatsu on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TokusatsuWikipedia:WikiProject TokusatsuTemplate:WikiProject TokusatsuTokusatsu articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Comics: Marvel Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Considering that the Red Ronin is an unthinking automaton, is it really appropriate to classify it as a "member" of the Thunderbolts?

Why is Red Ronin part of WikiProject Computing? Luis Dantas 13:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply

This seems like a mistake, so I've removed it. True, it's a robot, but it's a fictional robot. If there's a notable computer topic of the same name, then we can always create a disambiguation page and link to the respective articles. -- GentlemanGhost ( talk) 03:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply