This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yuck. This renaming business leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Sorry, but to this Longhorn it'll always be the Red River Shootout. · Katefan0 (scribble) 22:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
I agree with your take on the name change - I think it's the general consensus that the name stay the way it is. SBC can call it whatever they want - it will always be the Red River Shootout to me.
Will this game be changed to the AT&T Red River Rivalry?—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.119.9.189 (
talk •
contribs) 18:34, 2006 June 20
The article states " Darrell K. Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium seats 84,000 and may soon be expanded further." I was not aware expansion plans were being considered. We should add that the article on the stadium as well. Do we know a source? Johntex\ talk 22:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
All right, I know DKR fills up to about 84K normally, but Owen Field fills up to about 85K usually. I'm going to change the capacity of DKR to 80,082, the number listed on the official UT athletics site, just as the 82,112 is the official OU number. Tmrobertson 19:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Whats the relevance of the information in this section? It reads like a Sports Illustrated article, not an encyclopedia article. Mainly because this section will require editing immediately after the final outcome of the game - not a good standard for encyclopedia articles. Sorry for not being a registered user, I will get around to that soon.
I took out the information as it is now 2006. Let the score board do the talking.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.9.189 ( talk • contribs) 18:34, 2006 June 20
The following is the Austin American-Statesman article on the first ever game between UT and OU. It was published October 14 1900. Note that neither team was using their current team name at that time:
Posted by Johntex\ talk 22:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
WOAI (San Antonio) ran an article on their website ( here) which was a copy/paste of information from this article. I contacted them to let them know that Wikipedia is available under the GFDL but that they had to comply with that license, cite Wikipedia properly ( WP:CW), etc. They promptly took the article down. Good work to everyone who has made this article worth copying by a commercial news outlet!!! Johntex\ talk 22:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Johntex, I reverted your edits back to the previous by IP. He had the correct score which you reverted back to the incorrect score. Here is proof of the correct score: http://soonerstats.com/fb/seasons/schedule.cfm?SeasonID=1975. Just letting you know.-- NMajdan• talk 01:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
There should be a mention of the significance of the 2003 game. Currently, it is the game with the largest winning margin for either team.
I removed a verification/POV template from the article today because there were no specific concerns raised here on the talk page. I'm sure we can do better, but the article has a fair number of sources and generally seems (to me at least) to be pretty fair at discussing the two teams. If anyone wants to re-tag the article please list actual objections here so that they can be addressed. Thanks! Johntex\ talk 07:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I removed a section from 'Venue', because it sounded biased. There may be a better way to phrase what was written regarding the OU fans heckling the Texas players. It may be true, but at the very least, it needs a more neutral tone. I removed it because it sounded a little inflammatory. If someone can reword it neutrally, I wouldn't have a problem with them undoing my revision. →Deser† sapper•≈ talk 17:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree that it is true, Johtex. It's fairly well documented ('Bootlegger's Boy', 'Running with the Big Dogs', various DMN and DO articles throughout the years). The wording didn't sound objective enough. This DO article is the latest I've seen that mentions it: click here →Deser† sapper•≈ talk 16:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I dont think this section belongs in the article because whatever games are chosen, it'll be subjective to the views of the editor. Its ok for Bill Little to do it at Mackbrown-texasfootball.com, but I dont think wikipedia's the place for it. Corpx 05:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:OU-tx2006.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 15:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:SBC Red River Rivalry 100 year logo.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 22:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Red River Shootout/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This is a fairly well written article.. I'm not sure how expansion could take place but from a glance, it does not appear to be up to GA or FA standards. drumguy8800 C T 06:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
Last edited at 16:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yuck. This renaming business leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Sorry, but to this Longhorn it'll always be the Red River Shootout. · Katefan0 (scribble) 22:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
I agree with your take on the name change - I think it's the general consensus that the name stay the way it is. SBC can call it whatever they want - it will always be the Red River Shootout to me.
Will this game be changed to the AT&T Red River Rivalry?—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.119.9.189 (
talk •
contribs) 18:34, 2006 June 20
The article states " Darrell K. Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium seats 84,000 and may soon be expanded further." I was not aware expansion plans were being considered. We should add that the article on the stadium as well. Do we know a source? Johntex\ talk 22:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
All right, I know DKR fills up to about 84K normally, but Owen Field fills up to about 85K usually. I'm going to change the capacity of DKR to 80,082, the number listed on the official UT athletics site, just as the 82,112 is the official OU number. Tmrobertson 19:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Whats the relevance of the information in this section? It reads like a Sports Illustrated article, not an encyclopedia article. Mainly because this section will require editing immediately after the final outcome of the game - not a good standard for encyclopedia articles. Sorry for not being a registered user, I will get around to that soon.
I took out the information as it is now 2006. Let the score board do the talking.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.9.189 ( talk • contribs) 18:34, 2006 June 20
The following is the Austin American-Statesman article on the first ever game between UT and OU. It was published October 14 1900. Note that neither team was using their current team name at that time:
Posted by Johntex\ talk 22:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
WOAI (San Antonio) ran an article on their website ( here) which was a copy/paste of information from this article. I contacted them to let them know that Wikipedia is available under the GFDL but that they had to comply with that license, cite Wikipedia properly ( WP:CW), etc. They promptly took the article down. Good work to everyone who has made this article worth copying by a commercial news outlet!!! Johntex\ talk 22:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Johntex, I reverted your edits back to the previous by IP. He had the correct score which you reverted back to the incorrect score. Here is proof of the correct score: http://soonerstats.com/fb/seasons/schedule.cfm?SeasonID=1975. Just letting you know.-- NMajdan• talk 01:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
There should be a mention of the significance of the 2003 game. Currently, it is the game with the largest winning margin for either team.
I removed a verification/POV template from the article today because there were no specific concerns raised here on the talk page. I'm sure we can do better, but the article has a fair number of sources and generally seems (to me at least) to be pretty fair at discussing the two teams. If anyone wants to re-tag the article please list actual objections here so that they can be addressed. Thanks! Johntex\ talk 07:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I removed a section from 'Venue', because it sounded biased. There may be a better way to phrase what was written regarding the OU fans heckling the Texas players. It may be true, but at the very least, it needs a more neutral tone. I removed it because it sounded a little inflammatory. If someone can reword it neutrally, I wouldn't have a problem with them undoing my revision. →Deser† sapper•≈ talk 17:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree that it is true, Johtex. It's fairly well documented ('Bootlegger's Boy', 'Running with the Big Dogs', various DMN and DO articles throughout the years). The wording didn't sound objective enough. This DO article is the latest I've seen that mentions it: click here →Deser† sapper•≈ talk 16:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I dont think this section belongs in the article because whatever games are chosen, it'll be subjective to the views of the editor. Its ok for Bill Little to do it at Mackbrown-texasfootball.com, but I dont think wikipedia's the place for it. Corpx 05:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:OU-tx2006.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 15:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:SBC Red River Rivalry 100 year logo.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 22:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Red River Shootout/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This is a fairly well written article.. I'm not sure how expansion could take place but from a glance, it does not appear to be up to GA or FA standards. drumguy8800 C T 06:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
Last edited at 16:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)