![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I considered wether this was applicable to be in the wikipedia and concluded that under the guidelines it should be. for one the organisation is not a profitmaking business and more importantly It is regularly the subject of academic papers on art history and the history of design.
I will return when possible to add more detail - including a list of signifigant artists that have been associated with the group. DavidP 13:44, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I am highly sceptical of this entry. It seems to be promotional, and I only find 28 Google hits for it (not enough to substantiate it being "regularly the subject of academic papers on art history and the history of design"). Also, the entire entry has been plagiarised from the About.com topic about this artists' collective. I'm listing it on VfD.
216.158.31.195 16:37, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I am a member of Red Herring Studios and I have just been tidying up the spelling and punctuation of the entry and making sure the links work.
Red Herring is exactly as it is described - a not for profit artist's collective and its members have been active in the Brighton area and much further afield since 1985.
I agree we need to be more explicit with the references to members and their achievements. Being a relatively new member I am not best placed to do this but I will ask DavidP who is a founder member and origional author of this piece to have a look at it.
It is good to be suspicious jasongchu. but bias is something that is very hard to avoid. for instance as an american citizen you are probably not aware that the booker prize is britains most prestigious literary award and the Turner Prize is britains most prestigious award for the visual arts. I am sure that if you were aware of this your assertion that the subject is not 'notable' would be less rigourous. As you can probably imagine it is quite a notable feat for both of these awards to be associated with a single establishment.
DavidP 10:02, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Actually, I do know about the Turner and Booker prizes; after seeing them in the article, I did some looking up on wikipedia and google. I take your point, however, that matters of some great significance may be overlooked simply by regional bias. That said, if Vong Phaophanit is part of the collective, it is definitely notable. jglc | t | c 15:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hey DavidP; I'm glad to see your changes to the article. It looks good, now, and I'm looking forward to reading more about your collective. Thanks for your work, and I hope to learn more from your entries on Wikipedia. jglc | t | c 14:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I considered wether this was applicable to be in the wikipedia and concluded that under the guidelines it should be. for one the organisation is not a profitmaking business and more importantly It is regularly the subject of academic papers on art history and the history of design.
I will return when possible to add more detail - including a list of signifigant artists that have been associated with the group. DavidP 13:44, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I am highly sceptical of this entry. It seems to be promotional, and I only find 28 Google hits for it (not enough to substantiate it being "regularly the subject of academic papers on art history and the history of design"). Also, the entire entry has been plagiarised from the About.com topic about this artists' collective. I'm listing it on VfD.
216.158.31.195 16:37, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I am a member of Red Herring Studios and I have just been tidying up the spelling and punctuation of the entry and making sure the links work.
Red Herring is exactly as it is described - a not for profit artist's collective and its members have been active in the Brighton area and much further afield since 1985.
I agree we need to be more explicit with the references to members and their achievements. Being a relatively new member I am not best placed to do this but I will ask DavidP who is a founder member and origional author of this piece to have a look at it.
It is good to be suspicious jasongchu. but bias is something that is very hard to avoid. for instance as an american citizen you are probably not aware that the booker prize is britains most prestigious literary award and the Turner Prize is britains most prestigious award for the visual arts. I am sure that if you were aware of this your assertion that the subject is not 'notable' would be less rigourous. As you can probably imagine it is quite a notable feat for both of these awards to be associated with a single establishment.
DavidP 10:02, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Actually, I do know about the Turner and Booker prizes; after seeing them in the article, I did some looking up on wikipedia and google. I take your point, however, that matters of some great significance may be overlooked simply by regional bias. That said, if Vong Phaophanit is part of the collective, it is definitely notable. jglc | t | c 15:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hey DavidP; I'm glad to see your changes to the article. It looks good, now, and I'm looking forward to reading more about your collective. Thanks for your work, and I hope to learn more from your entries on Wikipedia. jglc | t | c 14:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)