This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China: History This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history. Tibet This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Tsadowsk.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 03:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Brandi, Your article on the Red Guards in Tibet is excellent. I can tell you put a lot of time and thought into creating this. Your introduction and overview of this topic is very precise, and you included a lot of helpful information. As always, splendid work! Kate-Pure ( talk) 00:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Excellent article on the Red Guard in Tibet. I think you did way better than me. You should be very proud of this. -- Aaedwar ( talk) 02:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, your article is great, only improvement I would suggest is under the Gyenlo and Nyamdre section, I would change the way that the members names are listed, maybe make the names bold or add dashes. It would make everything clearer to read. Good job!-- Alpatich ( talk) 00:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Great Job!!!! Very Informative. Great post overall! I really enjoyed what you had to say and thought you did a good job not adding any biased opinion to it. One thing that I thought might be helpful to enhance your article would be to add a "see also" section, linking to other wiki pages or even "an external links" section. This will help you to not be considered an "orphan article." Great job though, you had some really good information!-- Tsadowsk ( talk) 00:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Tsadowsk reply