This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It focuses on accommodation for ethnic and religious minorities; however, accommodation also applies to other grounds of discrimination. e.g. pregnancy, gender, age, disability or marital status.
The article unduly focuses on controversies arising out of Quebec.
Finally, several so-called "examples" mentioned in the article actually have nothing to do with reasonable accommodation in the legal sense of the term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.242.84 ( talk) 19:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
It most certainly does, at the bottom. I want to remove the tag. Any objections? Toddsschneider 23:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't have any objection, you can remove the tag Sd-100 18:39 22 August 2007 (Eastern time zone) —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 22:39, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
A lot of this entry is written in the style of a news story (e.g. "dominating the front pages", "agrees Mr..."). I somewhat suspect it was copy and pasted from a proprietary source at this point, although it could be that it's just been written by volunteers in this style. -- Padraic 00:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I have corrected a number of sentences in a section which I think was very good, but probably written by a non-native speaker. Johncmullen1960 ( talk) 08:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
In the intro, we should give more examples, like what happened in some specialized colleges, where muslisms asked for rooms where they could pray. They also asked for places where they could wash their feet.
It talks mostly about herouxville in the intro, it takes the most part of it.. adding examples would give a better contrast.
I will not make the operation for now, but I think the Commission itself, especially when the final report will be made, will have to be separated to its individual article. It is definitely as notable if not more then the Johnson Commission on the Concorde Overpass failure. Anyone agrees for a split?-- JForget 18:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Umm... the 8th citation is not working... what do you do? 99.237.118.215 ( talk) 22:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was Not moved. Mdann52 ( talk) 16:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC) (non-admin)
Rename: Reasonable accommodation → Reasonable accommodation debate (Quebec) – The majority of the article is about Quebec. An article about RA as a general concept can be recreated after the move. -- Kevlar ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks at least I understood it. Dennis Stoneham MA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.70.43.205 ( talk) 00:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
The section on Canada starts with something that is not a sentence. And then this: so-called cultural communities. If the article is not going to explain the ambiguity or disagreement about the phrase "cultural communities" (who calls them that? And why don't I agree?) then what's wrong with just plain "cultural communities"? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 03:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
In the global context "reasonable accommodation" is specifically about disability, not a grab-bag of issues unique to Quebec politics. So I've stripped out that content. If anyone feels upto it you're welcome to use that material for a seperate article. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 21:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It focuses on accommodation for ethnic and religious minorities; however, accommodation also applies to other grounds of discrimination. e.g. pregnancy, gender, age, disability or marital status.
The article unduly focuses on controversies arising out of Quebec.
Finally, several so-called "examples" mentioned in the article actually have nothing to do with reasonable accommodation in the legal sense of the term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.242.84 ( talk) 19:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
It most certainly does, at the bottom. I want to remove the tag. Any objections? Toddsschneider 23:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't have any objection, you can remove the tag Sd-100 18:39 22 August 2007 (Eastern time zone) —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 22:39, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
A lot of this entry is written in the style of a news story (e.g. "dominating the front pages", "agrees Mr..."). I somewhat suspect it was copy and pasted from a proprietary source at this point, although it could be that it's just been written by volunteers in this style. -- Padraic 00:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I have corrected a number of sentences in a section which I think was very good, but probably written by a non-native speaker. Johncmullen1960 ( talk) 08:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
In the intro, we should give more examples, like what happened in some specialized colleges, where muslisms asked for rooms where they could pray. They also asked for places where they could wash their feet.
It talks mostly about herouxville in the intro, it takes the most part of it.. adding examples would give a better contrast.
I will not make the operation for now, but I think the Commission itself, especially when the final report will be made, will have to be separated to its individual article. It is definitely as notable if not more then the Johnson Commission on the Concorde Overpass failure. Anyone agrees for a split?-- JForget 18:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Umm... the 8th citation is not working... what do you do? 99.237.118.215 ( talk) 22:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was Not moved. Mdann52 ( talk) 16:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC) (non-admin)
Rename: Reasonable accommodation → Reasonable accommodation debate (Quebec) – The majority of the article is about Quebec. An article about RA as a general concept can be recreated after the move. -- Kevlar ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks at least I understood it. Dennis Stoneham MA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.70.43.205 ( talk) 00:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
The section on Canada starts with something that is not a sentence. And then this: so-called cultural communities. If the article is not going to explain the ambiguity or disagreement about the phrase "cultural communities" (who calls them that? And why don't I agree?) then what's wrong with just plain "cultural communities"? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 03:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
In the global context "reasonable accommodation" is specifically about disability, not a grab-bag of issues unique to Quebec politics. So I've stripped out that content. If anyone feels upto it you're welcome to use that material for a seperate article. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 21:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)