Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
A large portion of this article is a
copyright violation of text from its two main sources, Peterson & Davie and Perkins. Text is copied verbatim.
TwilligToves (
talk)
04:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I have tried to rewrite major parts of the article, but having done so, I am of the opinion that the article may not meet GA status. I would request the reviewers to give a thorough review and take appropriate action. -- Nvineeth ( talk) 08:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I am also not convinced that the article meets Wikipedia:Good article criteria.
It doesn't look like this reassesment was ever concluded. What needs to be done to get it restarted? -- Kvng ( talk) 00:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
A large portion of this article is a
copyright violation of text from its two main sources, Peterson & Davie and Perkins. Text is copied verbatim.
TwilligToves (
talk)
04:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I have tried to rewrite major parts of the article, but having done so, I am of the opinion that the article may not meet GA status. I would request the reviewers to give a thorough review and take appropriate action. -- Nvineeth ( talk) 08:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I am also not convinced that the article meets Wikipedia:Good article criteria.
It doesn't look like this reassesment was ever concluded. What needs to be done to get it restarted? -- Kvng ( talk) 00:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)