This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Reactions to the Panama Papers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The flag and other icons are overkill, in my opinion. (I think there's a guideline on them somewhere.) The article would be better off without them. czar 02:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
I suggest to rename this page to Investigations of Panama Papers if anyone is going to split the content, because the actual content from the corresponding sections in Panama papers is about claims and investigations, not about international reactions. My very best wishes ( talk) 02:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
first, why is there hidden m/d/y and American English tags in the article? I don't see any reason for them, especially considering that the leaks did not occur in the US and the brunt of the backlash was arguably in Europe.
second, could this article be segmented into continents, rather than having a very long list of individual countries in alphabetical order?
third, I propose most or all of the content from Panama Papers#Allegations, reactions, and investigations being moved here, as the article has a length problem and this article seems to have mostly the same content. I have also brought this up on the Talk:Panama Papers page. Ashela ( talk) 19:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Reactions to the Panama Papers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The flag and other icons are overkill, in my opinion. (I think there's a guideline on them somewhere.) The article would be better off without them. czar 02:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
I suggest to rename this page to Investigations of Panama Papers if anyone is going to split the content, because the actual content from the corresponding sections in Panama papers is about claims and investigations, not about international reactions. My very best wishes ( talk) 02:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
first, why is there hidden m/d/y and American English tags in the article? I don't see any reason for them, especially considering that the leaks did not occur in the US and the brunt of the backlash was arguably in Europe.
second, could this article be segmented into continents, rather than having a very long list of individual countries in alphabetical order?
third, I propose most or all of the content from Panama Papers#Allegations, reactions, and investigations being moved here, as the article has a length problem and this article seems to have mostly the same content. I have also brought this up on the Talk:Panama Papers page. Ashela ( talk) 19:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)