![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Recently, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry[2] has been used to corroborate the mechanism of several organic reaction proposals.
Why is just this one specific method highlighted in the very short lede?
178.38.90.162 ( talk) 21:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
In general the description are evolving in time because is often difficult to sustain all the chemical facts observed in a reaction. This sentence which you have added to the intro is very unclear.
Did you mean (1) that the atomic positions are evolving in time, which is true but does not seem relevant to the end of the sentence, or (2) that scientists' ideas on the mechanism of many reactions are evolving in time, which is also true but can be said about most scientific problems. Could you explain further please? Dirac66 ( talk) 16:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Recently, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry[2] has been used to corroborate the mechanism of several organic reaction proposals.
Why is just this one specific method highlighted in the very short lede?
178.38.90.162 ( talk) 21:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
In general the description are evolving in time because is often difficult to sustain all the chemical facts observed in a reaction. This sentence which you have added to the intro is very unclear.
Did you mean (1) that the atomic positions are evolving in time, which is true but does not seem relevant to the end of the sentence, or (2) that scientists' ideas on the mechanism of many reactions are evolving in time, which is also true but can be said about most scientific problems. Could you explain further please? Dirac66 ( talk) 16:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)