This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rc (Unix shell) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Es (Unix shell) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 March 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rc (Unix shell). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | On 13 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rc to rc (Unix shell). The result of the discussion was moved. |
RC royial cycle rc shell → rc … Rationale: Just like mk its the only thing that is actually called rc … eeemess 02:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
The fonts that used for code examples, which supposedly should be fixed-width (because they use either <TT>/</TT> or <PRE>/</PRE> constructs), are rendered just like normal fonts. I looked at the page source, and it really has some stylesheets that do explictly command that bogus behavior. How do we get rid of those bogus stylesheets? Pappires ( talk) 03:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
How are the examples in that part of the article ,,more dynamic´´ than what Bash supports?
Yes, their syntax is simpler.
Yes, feel free to say ,,in rc, dynamic piping is much simpler.´´
No, rc is not ,,more powerful´´ in that aspect. Read bash(1) and stop fanboying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.116.207.116 ( talk) 15:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Killarnee ( talk) 20:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Rc → Rc (Unix shell) – (and redirect rc to RC) Not primary topic by pageviews or long-term significance (not prominent in search results on Google Scholar/Books). Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 18:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rc (Unix shell) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Es (Unix shell) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 March 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rc (Unix shell). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | On 13 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rc to rc (Unix shell). The result of the discussion was moved. |
RC royial cycle rc shell → rc … Rationale: Just like mk its the only thing that is actually called rc … eeemess 02:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
The fonts that used for code examples, which supposedly should be fixed-width (because they use either <TT>/</TT> or <PRE>/</PRE> constructs), are rendered just like normal fonts. I looked at the page source, and it really has some stylesheets that do explictly command that bogus behavior. How do we get rid of those bogus stylesheets? Pappires ( talk) 03:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
How are the examples in that part of the article ,,more dynamic´´ than what Bash supports?
Yes, their syntax is simpler.
Yes, feel free to say ,,in rc, dynamic piping is much simpler.´´
No, rc is not ,,more powerful´´ in that aspect. Read bash(1) and stop fanboying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.116.207.116 ( talk) 15:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Killarnee ( talk) 20:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Rc → Rc (Unix shell) – (and redirect rc to RC) Not primary topic by pageviews or long-term significance (not prominent in search results on Google Scholar/Books). Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 18:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)