A fact from Raymond Arritt appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 January 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unfortunately, the ref for the hook fact is offline. When 2000 people share something, I'd arrive at .05%. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Not the world's greatest source, but it is a source, if someone wants to briefly add that he was a Wikipedian: [3]. I'm not usually in favor of doing that except for people who are publicly notable for being Wikipedians, but I saw it mentioned above, so I did a Google search. Softlavender ( talk) 02:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
I hate to say this but I am unable to see about his passing NACADEMIC. I do neither feel that being a co-author of IPCC report makes the cut. Views are welcome:-) ∯WBG converse 13:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, I'm thinking somewhere on the order of:
-- Softlavender ( talk) 00:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
A fact from Raymond Arritt appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 January 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unfortunately, the ref for the hook fact is offline. When 2000 people share something, I'd arrive at .05%. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Not the world's greatest source, but it is a source, if someone wants to briefly add that he was a Wikipedian: [3]. I'm not usually in favor of doing that except for people who are publicly notable for being Wikipedians, but I saw it mentioned above, so I did a Google search. Softlavender ( talk) 02:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
I hate to say this but I am unable to see about his passing NACADEMIC. I do neither feel that being a co-author of IPCC report makes the cut. Views are welcome:-) ∯WBG converse 13:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, I'm thinking somewhere on the order of:
-- Softlavender ( talk) 00:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)