![]() | Ravenloft (module) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 6, 2010. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A
Neverwinter Nights version of module
http://nwn.bioware.com/players/modprofile_spires.html.
Have put this link here as a placeholder for latter incorporation into the article. -
Waza
23:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Possibly encounter format derived from "Delve format" as per http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dd/20060317a Need to look for a source to confirm this. - Waza 03:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I have added this sectrion to make notes on how this article is going at meeting Good Article criteria. Please add to make comments about this here until it is ready for nomination - Waza 01:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe this article has now reached the standard to be considered a good article and am planning to soon nominate it for Good article status. Please comment/edit if you agree disagree. The first criteria it is (1) It is well written. is my biggest concern as I have been so close to this article is hard to see its flaw, any feedback is very much appreciated. I do believe firmly it (2) is factually accurate and verifiable, (3) broad in its coverage, (4) follows the neutral point of view policy, (5) stable and (6) contains images, where appopriate, to illustrate the topic. - Waza 11:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Some prose glitches and minor issues, but passable. No major issues with references. A criticism section may help, but overall fine. — Deckill er 12:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
As per the Requested Pictures request, I've uploaded Image:House of Strahd lr.JPG, and Image:Ravenloft Silver lr.JPG. -- Maelwys 15:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I've undone the article split for the following reasons:
- Drilnoth ( talk) 13:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
This article if the WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons weekly article focus, with the goal being to get it a few steps closer to FA status. - Drilnoth ( talk) 16:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
-remove indent-Added another review of Expedition to Castle Ravenloft. - Drilnoth ( talk) 22:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Many improvements have been made to this article since it became GA-class ( Diff), and I think that it probably qualifies for A-class. Meeting the A-class criteria requires the support of at least two uninvolved editors; what do you all think? - Drilnoth ( talk) 13:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
There's a semi-automated review available now; I don't know if that's all we're going to get, but it's got some pointers there. BOZ ( talk) 13:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
The article currently includes "Strahd is notable for his then-innovative combination of monster and character, having the abilities of both vampires and magic-users.[8] In this release he is a level 10 magic-user, whereas the first edition rules only allowed selected humanoid races to acquire character classes.[7]"
While I realize WP gives great deference to sourced material, these two sentences at best should be heavily qualified, and at worst are flat-out false. The second sentence is clearly false, as 1st ed AD&D explicitly allows vampires to have m-u levels -- see DMG 179, footnote to Monster Table X (it is also implied in the next-to-last paragraph of the 1st ed MM entry on the vampire). Also, contrary to the first sentence, module Q1 includes Vlad Tolenkov, a 15th level magic-user vampire with a complete stat write-up. Maybe this was notable to the authors of the cited sources, but surely Wikipedia can improve on those sources. I don't have a suggestion for how to fix this (except the obvious route of simply cutting those sentences), but something should be done. Truly Trivial ( talk) 07:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I have reanimated this topic and rewritten the offending sentence. I was tempted to cut it entirely, but I suppose you could defend it as Webwarlock does above. It still remains patently false that Strahd was the first published instance of a vampire with magic-user levels (he's maybe the 3rd or 4th!). Truly Trivial ( talk) 06:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
On the 3rd paragraph of the Original edition section. If citation doesn't specifically say "kill" as distinct from "defeat" within the context of the citation (I don't have source of citation) maybe it will be best to change kill with defeat.-- LexCorp ( talk) 00:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
The module was reviewed in the following magazines (although it looks like some of these are listed already): Dragon #205 (1994), Dragon #81 (1984), Space Gamer V1, #72 (1985), White Dwarf #55 (1984), White Wolf #42 (1994) 71.194.32.252 ( talk) 07:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I removed this from the article as OR made from observing the game and drawing conclusions from its content: " While the I6 Ravenloft module is not explicitly mentioned in any of the Ravenloft campaign setting materials, the fictional timeline given in these materials suggests that the events depicted in the module would have played out a couple hundred years prior to the events depicted in the campaign settings. [note 1]"
I do not believe we can include anything here that sources merely suggest. Cheers! Scapler ( talk) 04:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Would there be any opposition to my cleanup up the page's style by using a citation format similar to the one used in the main Dungeons & Dragons article, rather than having the inline numbers? – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 17:13, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
This looks really solid, though I must defer to others on how comprehensive it is. For a module that's been so important it seems like there are only a few sources consulted. But if that's all there is, then that's all there is.
I recommend getting Awadewit to take a quick look before re-nominating it to FAC — assuming she has time (which she might not). She's probably the most thorough reviewer on Wikipedia at the moment.
Good luck with this! Scartol • Tok 18:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
David Gibson of the fan review site Fraternity of Shadows criticized the revised module, especially its gameplay. As it was printed as a part of the Ravenloft campaign setting, many pertinent details found elsewhere in the box set are not provided. This, Gibson claims, makes it difficult to run House of Strahd as a stand-alone adventure. [1]
but makes no mention of how to use it in the Ravenloft campaign setting. The maps for Castle Ravenloft were rendered in 3-D orthogonal effect, similar to the maps in the original Ravenloft adventure. [2]
Expedition to Castle Ravenloft is the first 3rd edition Dungeons & Dragons adventure which provides Dungeon Masters with a new format for combat scenarios and encounters; each encounter has a two-page spread on which all pertinent statistics for monsters, terrain, and traps can be found. [3] [2] This format has been criticized because of how much information must be repeated from one spread to another, and how much unnecessary material seems to be used to fill two pages in many cases. [2] John Cooper criticized the adventure's artwork, noting that some pieces were used more than once in the book, and that several pieces were reused from previous Dungeons & Dragons books. Cooper also criticized the artwork's departure from that of the original work, citing how it alternately depicts Strahd as a feeble old man and then as a young man with long hair and elven ears. [2]
Rules required | Dungeons & Dragons version 3.5 |
---|---|
Character levels | 6–9 |
Campaign setting | Generic Dungeons & Dragons |
Authors | Bruce Cordell and James Wyatt |
First published | 2006 |
Linked modules | |
Expedition to Castle Ravenloft, Expedition to the Demonweb Pits, Expedition to Undermountain, Expedition to the Ruins of Greyhawk |
Code | I10 |
---|---|
Rules required | Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition |
Character levels | 8–10 |
Campaign setting | Generic Advanced Dungeons & Dragons |
Authors | Tracy & Laura Hickman |
First published | 1986 |
Linked modules | |
I1, I2, I3, I4, I5, I6, I7, I8, I9, I10, I11, I12, I13, I14 |
The module also featured a gypsy fortune-telling session, which randomly determined certain plot elements [3] so that factors such as Strahd's motivations could change between games. [4]
In 1990, TSR based a horror-themed second edition Advanced Dungeons & Dragons campaign setting on the module. The setting's first edition boxed set was titled Realm of Terror, but was later changed to Ravenloft. It has been published in several editions and has inspired various module, supplement, novel, and video game adaptations. citation needed The campaign setting moves Barovia from an unnamed location to a demiplane, an alternate dimension called variously "Ravenloft" or "the Demiplane of Dread". Barovia is the central and, chronologically, the first of many cursed lands to have been moved from their original location to this demiplane. [5] Still, descriptions of Barovia and Strahd generally match those of the original module. [6]
The module was well received by players and Dungeon Masters, [7] and the orthogonal maps of Castle Ravenloft earned fan's admiration. [3]
The revised version contained a 64-page book with a fold-out map. While the layout was mostly redone, Nesmith reused much of the original text and artwork, with additional art by James Crabtree and a new cover by Dana M. Knutson. [8]
It was originally called Vampyr, [9] [9]
Written by Bruce Cordell and James Wyatt with cover art by Kev Walker, the book returns to the original Ravenloft module's plot and conventions, removing the demiplane setting used in the Ravenloft campaign setting. [10]
References
Exp Intro
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Hick4to6
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Rateliff
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).HOS
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).[1] [2] [3] Can't find daystar nexus, but maybe internet archive has it. - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 19:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Maybe Wired.com did a review, but I can't find it.
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2007/12/top-10-dd-mod-1/ similar to
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2008/01/top-10-dd-mod-1/ and
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2007/12/top-10-dd-mod-3/ -
Peregrine Fisher (
talk) (
contribs)
06:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Dummies has more info in it. [4] - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 04:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
So does the Fantastic Vampire book. [5] - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 16:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good! I'll help out where I can. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 22:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
References
Should the paragraph
Go in Publication history or Reception? - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 04:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
The main thing left, besides a bit of copy editing, is the image. Three image options: say the cover in the infobox depicts Strahd and he's kinda important plus it IDs the module, in the body of the article show a picture of the maps which are commented on quite a bit in secondary sources, or include both two non-free images. Thoughts? - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 03:49, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Is this useful? From Roger E. Moore's editorial in Dragon #156 (April 1990): "Those of you who enjoy instilling real fear into your AD&D campaigns should look for a certain boxed set called Ravenloft this May, from designer Bruce Nesmith and editor Andria Hayday; it encompasses the superb Tracy Hickman module, as well as many other wonderful things." 67.175.176.178 ( talk) 00:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Need to check WD87 quote, since it isn't perfect grammar. - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 02:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
FYI, House of Strahd was reviewed in White Wolf magazine #42. 204.153.84.10 ( talk) 23:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Wizards of the coast have released a stand alone game based on this module. See: http://wizards.com/dnd/Product.aspx?x=dnd/products/dndacc/207790000 Gill smoke ( talk) 12:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Is there any particular reason why there's no mention of the third-party licensed version of Ravenloft produced for D&D 3.0/3.5 by the Sword & Sorcery imprint from White Wolf? MythicFox ( talk) 20:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ravenloft (module). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ravenloft (module). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Ravenloft (module) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 6, 2010. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A
Neverwinter Nights version of module
http://nwn.bioware.com/players/modprofile_spires.html.
Have put this link here as a placeholder for latter incorporation into the article. -
Waza
23:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Possibly encounter format derived from "Delve format" as per http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dd/20060317a Need to look for a source to confirm this. - Waza 03:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I have added this sectrion to make notes on how this article is going at meeting Good Article criteria. Please add to make comments about this here until it is ready for nomination - Waza 01:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe this article has now reached the standard to be considered a good article and am planning to soon nominate it for Good article status. Please comment/edit if you agree disagree. The first criteria it is (1) It is well written. is my biggest concern as I have been so close to this article is hard to see its flaw, any feedback is very much appreciated. I do believe firmly it (2) is factually accurate and verifiable, (3) broad in its coverage, (4) follows the neutral point of view policy, (5) stable and (6) contains images, where appopriate, to illustrate the topic. - Waza 11:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Some prose glitches and minor issues, but passable. No major issues with references. A criticism section may help, but overall fine. — Deckill er 12:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
As per the Requested Pictures request, I've uploaded Image:House of Strahd lr.JPG, and Image:Ravenloft Silver lr.JPG. -- Maelwys 15:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I've undone the article split for the following reasons:
- Drilnoth ( talk) 13:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
This article if the WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons weekly article focus, with the goal being to get it a few steps closer to FA status. - Drilnoth ( talk) 16:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
-remove indent-Added another review of Expedition to Castle Ravenloft. - Drilnoth ( talk) 22:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Many improvements have been made to this article since it became GA-class ( Diff), and I think that it probably qualifies for A-class. Meeting the A-class criteria requires the support of at least two uninvolved editors; what do you all think? - Drilnoth ( talk) 13:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
There's a semi-automated review available now; I don't know if that's all we're going to get, but it's got some pointers there. BOZ ( talk) 13:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
The article currently includes "Strahd is notable for his then-innovative combination of monster and character, having the abilities of both vampires and magic-users.[8] In this release he is a level 10 magic-user, whereas the first edition rules only allowed selected humanoid races to acquire character classes.[7]"
While I realize WP gives great deference to sourced material, these two sentences at best should be heavily qualified, and at worst are flat-out false. The second sentence is clearly false, as 1st ed AD&D explicitly allows vampires to have m-u levels -- see DMG 179, footnote to Monster Table X (it is also implied in the next-to-last paragraph of the 1st ed MM entry on the vampire). Also, contrary to the first sentence, module Q1 includes Vlad Tolenkov, a 15th level magic-user vampire with a complete stat write-up. Maybe this was notable to the authors of the cited sources, but surely Wikipedia can improve on those sources. I don't have a suggestion for how to fix this (except the obvious route of simply cutting those sentences), but something should be done. Truly Trivial ( talk) 07:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I have reanimated this topic and rewritten the offending sentence. I was tempted to cut it entirely, but I suppose you could defend it as Webwarlock does above. It still remains patently false that Strahd was the first published instance of a vampire with magic-user levels (he's maybe the 3rd or 4th!). Truly Trivial ( talk) 06:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
On the 3rd paragraph of the Original edition section. If citation doesn't specifically say "kill" as distinct from "defeat" within the context of the citation (I don't have source of citation) maybe it will be best to change kill with defeat.-- LexCorp ( talk) 00:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
The module was reviewed in the following magazines (although it looks like some of these are listed already): Dragon #205 (1994), Dragon #81 (1984), Space Gamer V1, #72 (1985), White Dwarf #55 (1984), White Wolf #42 (1994) 71.194.32.252 ( talk) 07:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I removed this from the article as OR made from observing the game and drawing conclusions from its content: " While the I6 Ravenloft module is not explicitly mentioned in any of the Ravenloft campaign setting materials, the fictional timeline given in these materials suggests that the events depicted in the module would have played out a couple hundred years prior to the events depicted in the campaign settings. [note 1]"
I do not believe we can include anything here that sources merely suggest. Cheers! Scapler ( talk) 04:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Would there be any opposition to my cleanup up the page's style by using a citation format similar to the one used in the main Dungeons & Dragons article, rather than having the inline numbers? – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 17:13, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
This looks really solid, though I must defer to others on how comprehensive it is. For a module that's been so important it seems like there are only a few sources consulted. But if that's all there is, then that's all there is.
I recommend getting Awadewit to take a quick look before re-nominating it to FAC — assuming she has time (which she might not). She's probably the most thorough reviewer on Wikipedia at the moment.
Good luck with this! Scartol • Tok 18:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
David Gibson of the fan review site Fraternity of Shadows criticized the revised module, especially its gameplay. As it was printed as a part of the Ravenloft campaign setting, many pertinent details found elsewhere in the box set are not provided. This, Gibson claims, makes it difficult to run House of Strahd as a stand-alone adventure. [1]
but makes no mention of how to use it in the Ravenloft campaign setting. The maps for Castle Ravenloft were rendered in 3-D orthogonal effect, similar to the maps in the original Ravenloft adventure. [2]
Expedition to Castle Ravenloft is the first 3rd edition Dungeons & Dragons adventure which provides Dungeon Masters with a new format for combat scenarios and encounters; each encounter has a two-page spread on which all pertinent statistics for monsters, terrain, and traps can be found. [3] [2] This format has been criticized because of how much information must be repeated from one spread to another, and how much unnecessary material seems to be used to fill two pages in many cases. [2] John Cooper criticized the adventure's artwork, noting that some pieces were used more than once in the book, and that several pieces were reused from previous Dungeons & Dragons books. Cooper also criticized the artwork's departure from that of the original work, citing how it alternately depicts Strahd as a feeble old man and then as a young man with long hair and elven ears. [2]
Rules required | Dungeons & Dragons version 3.5 |
---|---|
Character levels | 6–9 |
Campaign setting | Generic Dungeons & Dragons |
Authors | Bruce Cordell and James Wyatt |
First published | 2006 |
Linked modules | |
Expedition to Castle Ravenloft, Expedition to the Demonweb Pits, Expedition to Undermountain, Expedition to the Ruins of Greyhawk |
Code | I10 |
---|---|
Rules required | Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition |
Character levels | 8–10 |
Campaign setting | Generic Advanced Dungeons & Dragons |
Authors | Tracy & Laura Hickman |
First published | 1986 |
Linked modules | |
I1, I2, I3, I4, I5, I6, I7, I8, I9, I10, I11, I12, I13, I14 |
The module also featured a gypsy fortune-telling session, which randomly determined certain plot elements [3] so that factors such as Strahd's motivations could change between games. [4]
In 1990, TSR based a horror-themed second edition Advanced Dungeons & Dragons campaign setting on the module. The setting's first edition boxed set was titled Realm of Terror, but was later changed to Ravenloft. It has been published in several editions and has inspired various module, supplement, novel, and video game adaptations. citation needed The campaign setting moves Barovia from an unnamed location to a demiplane, an alternate dimension called variously "Ravenloft" or "the Demiplane of Dread". Barovia is the central and, chronologically, the first of many cursed lands to have been moved from their original location to this demiplane. [5] Still, descriptions of Barovia and Strahd generally match those of the original module. [6]
The module was well received by players and Dungeon Masters, [7] and the orthogonal maps of Castle Ravenloft earned fan's admiration. [3]
The revised version contained a 64-page book with a fold-out map. While the layout was mostly redone, Nesmith reused much of the original text and artwork, with additional art by James Crabtree and a new cover by Dana M. Knutson. [8]
It was originally called Vampyr, [9] [9]
Written by Bruce Cordell and James Wyatt with cover art by Kev Walker, the book returns to the original Ravenloft module's plot and conventions, removing the demiplane setting used in the Ravenloft campaign setting. [10]
References
Exp Intro
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Hick4to6
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Rateliff
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).HOS
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).[1] [2] [3] Can't find daystar nexus, but maybe internet archive has it. - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 19:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Maybe Wired.com did a review, but I can't find it.
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2007/12/top-10-dd-mod-1/ similar to
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2008/01/top-10-dd-mod-1/ and
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2007/12/top-10-dd-mod-3/ -
Peregrine Fisher (
talk) (
contribs)
06:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Dummies has more info in it. [4] - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 04:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
So does the Fantastic Vampire book. [5] - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 16:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good! I'll help out where I can. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 22:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
References
Should the paragraph
Go in Publication history or Reception? - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 04:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
The main thing left, besides a bit of copy editing, is the image. Three image options: say the cover in the infobox depicts Strahd and he's kinda important plus it IDs the module, in the body of the article show a picture of the maps which are commented on quite a bit in secondary sources, or include both two non-free images. Thoughts? - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 03:49, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Is this useful? From Roger E. Moore's editorial in Dragon #156 (April 1990): "Those of you who enjoy instilling real fear into your AD&D campaigns should look for a certain boxed set called Ravenloft this May, from designer Bruce Nesmith and editor Andria Hayday; it encompasses the superb Tracy Hickman module, as well as many other wonderful things." 67.175.176.178 ( talk) 00:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Need to check WD87 quote, since it isn't perfect grammar. - Peregrine Fisher ( talk) ( contribs) 02:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
FYI, House of Strahd was reviewed in White Wolf magazine #42. 204.153.84.10 ( talk) 23:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Wizards of the coast have released a stand alone game based on this module. See: http://wizards.com/dnd/Product.aspx?x=dnd/products/dndacc/207790000 Gill smoke ( talk) 12:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Is there any particular reason why there's no mention of the third-party licensed version of Ravenloft produced for D&D 3.0/3.5 by the Sword & Sorcery imprint from White Wolf? MythicFox ( talk) 20:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ravenloft (module). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ravenloft (module). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)