This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
I have just modified 2 external links on
Rape in Saudi Arabia. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
In the section absence of evidence, the part physical evidence is declined due to lack of witnesses is absent in the provided source. It should be changed to just sometimes physical evidence are declined.
2402:3A80:15FB:BC28:3015:1FB0:9F21:EA34 (
talk) 15:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Partly done: I just removed the section because it was more or less unintelligible.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 12:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Copyright violation
2A02:C7C:E83A:0:B0E0:A427:BED6:E7EE, you have to paraphrase whatever you add to the articles (with a reliable source) or else someone or the other will revert it for copyright violation.-
1Firang (
talk) 15:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I did it myself because nobody else did.-
1Firang (
talk) 03:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks for fixing the copyvio, but please follow the instructions
here or file the copyvio
here instead in future. Thanks again,
Sneezless (
talk) (
contribs) 17:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Could you provide the source which was copied from? Thanks,
Sneezless (
talk) (
contribs) 17:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
@
1Firang: Honestly, I recommend cutting the Girl of Qatif paragraph in the lead, it doesn't fit well in the lead and is a mess of a sentence. The original justification for it replacing the previous sentence wasn't very good either.
FutureFlowsLoveYou (
talk) 17:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
It's anecdotal information that doesn't fit the lead of a broad overview subject.
Iskandar323 (
talk) 18:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I have been given a "final warning" for
tendentious editing (see my talk page), so I want to take a break from contentious articles. I, however, wish you people can balance the article instead of removing everything that is critical of Islam.-
1Firang (
talk) 19:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is about Saudi Arabia, not Islam, so I'm not sure what you're getting at there. You seem to assume that people practice what they preach, which is more often than not not the case. But that wasn't the point here at all. Leads are the strictest summaries; they should never contain large tracts of anecdotal content.
Iskandar323 (
talk) 20:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The lead section contains four sentences. One of these is that Saudi Arabia does not recognise marital rape. Aside from this, its content is similar to the lead sections of
Rape in the United States &
Rape in France. The former, for example, does not include a section on
Rape culture, which is a significant topic of discourse in some US contexts, or the
MeToo movement, or the
Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination. The lead for
Rape in India does not cover recent Hindutva politicians' campaigning against the criminalisation of marital rape. I don't see a single Rape in X article that covers individual rape cases in the lead section. (
Rape in Germany comes close, & I wonder if the section on mass rape in World War II should be moved lower in the article.) If you think rape is bad, regardless of who is forcing whom (as I hope all readers do), 25% of the sentences in the lead section of this article make Saudi Arabia look bad. There's nothing particularly favourable. This isn't about whitewashing Islam: It's about creating balanced articles based on secondary sources & with effective leads.
Pathawi (
talk) 08:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
It is fine to balance articles but removing sourced content just because someone doesn't like it is whitewashing and should not be done.-
1Firang (
talk) 15:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
I have just modified 2 external links on
Rape in Saudi Arabia. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
In the section absence of evidence, the part physical evidence is declined due to lack of witnesses is absent in the provided source. It should be changed to just sometimes physical evidence are declined.
2402:3A80:15FB:BC28:3015:1FB0:9F21:EA34 (
talk) 15:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Partly done: I just removed the section because it was more or less unintelligible.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 12:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Copyright violation
2A02:C7C:E83A:0:B0E0:A427:BED6:E7EE, you have to paraphrase whatever you add to the articles (with a reliable source) or else someone or the other will revert it for copyright violation.-
1Firang (
talk) 15:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I did it myself because nobody else did.-
1Firang (
talk) 03:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks for fixing the copyvio, but please follow the instructions
here or file the copyvio
here instead in future. Thanks again,
Sneezless (
talk) (
contribs) 17:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Could you provide the source which was copied from? Thanks,
Sneezless (
talk) (
contribs) 17:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
@
1Firang: Honestly, I recommend cutting the Girl of Qatif paragraph in the lead, it doesn't fit well in the lead and is a mess of a sentence. The original justification for it replacing the previous sentence wasn't very good either.
FutureFlowsLoveYou (
talk) 17:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
It's anecdotal information that doesn't fit the lead of a broad overview subject.
Iskandar323 (
talk) 18:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I have been given a "final warning" for
tendentious editing (see my talk page), so I want to take a break from contentious articles. I, however, wish you people can balance the article instead of removing everything that is critical of Islam.-
1Firang (
talk) 19:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is about Saudi Arabia, not Islam, so I'm not sure what you're getting at there. You seem to assume that people practice what they preach, which is more often than not not the case. But that wasn't the point here at all. Leads are the strictest summaries; they should never contain large tracts of anecdotal content.
Iskandar323 (
talk) 20:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The lead section contains four sentences. One of these is that Saudi Arabia does not recognise marital rape. Aside from this, its content is similar to the lead sections of
Rape in the United States &
Rape in France. The former, for example, does not include a section on
Rape culture, which is a significant topic of discourse in some US contexts, or the
MeToo movement, or the
Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination. The lead for
Rape in India does not cover recent Hindutva politicians' campaigning against the criminalisation of marital rape. I don't see a single Rape in X article that covers individual rape cases in the lead section. (
Rape in Germany comes close, & I wonder if the section on mass rape in World War II should be moved lower in the article.) If you think rape is bad, regardless of who is forcing whom (as I hope all readers do), 25% of the sentences in the lead section of this article make Saudi Arabia look bad. There's nothing particularly favourable. This isn't about whitewashing Islam: It's about creating balanced articles based on secondary sources & with effective leads.
Pathawi (
talk) 08:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
It is fine to balance articles but removing sourced content just because someone doesn't like it is whitewashing and should not be done.-
1Firang (
talk) 15:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply