![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 |
![]() | This
edit request to
Rape has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The etymology should also referred to “bringing pleasure to” because at this time men thought they were bringing pleasure to the other person because they thought the other person “really wanted it” and since the other person climaxed against their will through stimulation, not pleasure; the term was written by men for men in a man’s world that only they created languages - which weren’t inclusive in much of the world - women were largely seen as a commodity and property, as a second rate citizen or below that.
i.e. the etymology of the word “man” meant “the hand which held intellect and knowledge” aka why men created the word “woman” People are often misinformed and lead to think or assume the word “wo” is derived from the word womb which it is not. The etymology of “wo” meant “wife of man” and “man” being “the hand which held intellect and knowledge“. Girls were raised to become a wife. (Girl you’ll be a woman soon)
Thank you 🙏 Ferrari Unicorn ( talk) 12:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Following Ferrari Unicorn ( talk) 12:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
The article has a heavy American emphasis. Some facts are specifically written that they apply in the United States, so there is no general information. Crucially, other facts stated as general, but actually apply to the United States. The majority of women live under rape laws that follow a coercive-model and/or always allow marital sex (see sexual consent). Following the information in the article may lead to being misled about what someone needs to do in a sexually risky situation or in seeking justice. Travelmite ( talk) 00:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
There are numerous issues with the graphs and plots in this article. I have mentioned one case in the "Lead image" section on this talk page. Here are some further issues:
The Elysian Vector Fields ( talk) 00:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Consideration should be given to including these aspects of the topic, seemingly little or indirectly referenced, or not referenced at all:
- The ludicrous improbability that the mean figure - for reporting, given as Lithuania at 6.3/100,000/year, is other than a gross under-estimation of the true rate of occurrence, as distinct from the rate of reporting.
- The recent public discourse - in much of the West at least - of the distinction and importance of the notion of "enthusiastic", and otherwise "less than enthusiastic" consent, as it relates to consent, and consequent criminal culpability.
- The near ubiquitous poor public understanding of the topic generally. To wit, my personal experience that, when pressed, very many persons of both sexes reveal a limited and wholly inadequate, unsatisfactory and insufficient understanding of what constitutes sexual assault, and the confounding effect this has on people's perceptions and views of the issue. Namely, it's not generally understood that any conduct whatever that could be construed as of a sexual nature, that another party does not consent to, and which you nevertheless persist in, constitutes - prima facie - a sexual assault. When queried people almost invariably, and inappropriately, describe sexual assault (or rape) in specific terms, and not with a more appropriate general characterisation, as given above. 122.151.210.84 ( talk) 05:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 |
![]() | This
edit request to
Rape has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The etymology should also referred to “bringing pleasure to” because at this time men thought they were bringing pleasure to the other person because they thought the other person “really wanted it” and since the other person climaxed against their will through stimulation, not pleasure; the term was written by men for men in a man’s world that only they created languages - which weren’t inclusive in much of the world - women were largely seen as a commodity and property, as a second rate citizen or below that.
i.e. the etymology of the word “man” meant “the hand which held intellect and knowledge” aka why men created the word “woman” People are often misinformed and lead to think or assume the word “wo” is derived from the word womb which it is not. The etymology of “wo” meant “wife of man” and “man” being “the hand which held intellect and knowledge“. Girls were raised to become a wife. (Girl you’ll be a woman soon)
Thank you 🙏 Ferrari Unicorn ( talk) 12:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Following Ferrari Unicorn ( talk) 12:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
The article has a heavy American emphasis. Some facts are specifically written that they apply in the United States, so there is no general information. Crucially, other facts stated as general, but actually apply to the United States. The majority of women live under rape laws that follow a coercive-model and/or always allow marital sex (see sexual consent). Following the information in the article may lead to being misled about what someone needs to do in a sexually risky situation or in seeking justice. Travelmite ( talk) 00:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
There are numerous issues with the graphs and plots in this article. I have mentioned one case in the "Lead image" section on this talk page. Here are some further issues:
The Elysian Vector Fields ( talk) 00:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Consideration should be given to including these aspects of the topic, seemingly little or indirectly referenced, or not referenced at all:
- The ludicrous improbability that the mean figure - for reporting, given as Lithuania at 6.3/100,000/year, is other than a gross under-estimation of the true rate of occurrence, as distinct from the rate of reporting.
- The recent public discourse - in much of the West at least - of the distinction and importance of the notion of "enthusiastic", and otherwise "less than enthusiastic" consent, as it relates to consent, and consequent criminal culpability.
- The near ubiquitous poor public understanding of the topic generally. To wit, my personal experience that, when pressed, very many persons of both sexes reveal a limited and wholly inadequate, unsatisfactory and insufficient understanding of what constitutes sexual assault, and the confounding effect this has on people's perceptions and views of the issue. Namely, it's not generally understood that any conduct whatever that could be construed as of a sexual nature, that another party does not consent to, and which you nevertheless persist in, constitutes - prima facie - a sexual assault. When queried people almost invariably, and inappropriately, describe sexual assault (or rape) in specific terms, and not with a more appropriate general characterisation, as given above. 122.151.210.84 ( talk) 05:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)