This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Randy Neugebauer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Committee Assignments Need to be Updated--request edit
Subcommittee Names and Assignments have changed in 113th Congress.
Financial Services:
Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance (Chairman)
[1]
Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises
[2]
Agriculture:
Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management
Subcommittee on Livestock Dairy and Poultry is now Livestock, Rural Development, and CreditCite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the
help page).
Subcommittee on Environment
[3]
Starfi$h (
talk) 19:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Edit needed request change
The second paragraph is incorrect: 'Neugebauer finished first in the crowded seven-way, all-Republican field.' It was in fact a seventeen-way field [4] Starfi$h ( talk) 15:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I just reverted an edit regarding a minor incident with a Park Ranger. The edit was filled with POV terms and written in an overly dramatic manner. Even the title of the section, calling it a "showdown" was over the top. Even without the POV terms, this is a big case of WP:RECENTISM. We're not a newspaper and this minor event will probably disappear from the news cycle quickly. I think we need to discuss it here first. Niteshift36 ( talk) 20:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Disagree. It's a citeable event that happened, and its definitely not a minor event. Actions, words, and speeches by highly-visible politicians are clearly article content. I don't see you making the same case for the "Baby Killer" topic. 108.131.133.245 ( 108.131.133.245) — 108.131.133.245 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
I wouldn't call it a non-event: it's an event that's "gone viral", and speaks well to the congressman's biographical profile. Many voters rely on WikiPedia come election time, as they otherwise pay no attention to politicians. Congressman Neugebauer's pubic record is a matter of biographical lore. It appears you're injecting a fair amount of your opinion and political beliefs into your argument for removing any mention of public events that Congressman Neugebauer is the center of.
108.131.133.245 (
108.131.133.245)—
108.131.133.245 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding
unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
Still not seeing any support for your claim of "non-event" or that you're not injecting your one-sided political beliefs into the argument. 108.131.133.245 ( 108.131.133.245)— 108.131.133.245 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
Your Wiki profile suggest you're a card-carrying republican. Removal of mention of this significant event from his Wiki page, by you, is pretty clearly politically motivated.
108.131.133.245 (
108.131.133.245) —
108.131.133.245 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding
unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
I probably could figure it out, but it's entertaining seeing you get bent out of shape over unsigned posts.....I'm thinking I should edit the whole article...remove everything not 10 years old. Since no one uses Wikipedia as an information source, especially high shcoolers and voters, who'll notice?.
108.131.133.245 (
108.131.133.245) —
108.131.133.245 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding
unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
I am not very experienced in Wikipedia, but I feel this recent incident with the park ranger is a significant event, as important as him shouting baby killer at someone. The reason I believe this is that I have been the unpaid Park Ranger working the barrier and taking the abuse of the general public during prior shutdowns. Now, most of these people are frustrated and confused. They don't understand that it is not a decision the ranger at the barrier made, which is keeping them from entering, but a decision made by the leaders of the nation. When one of the leaders of the nation who caused the incident berates a person making barely above minimum wage, basically at one of the lowest levels of authority over that opening or closing decision, OVER AN INCIDENT HE HIMSELF CREATED that is an unprecedented level of hypocrisy and posturing for the cameras. He thought he'd look like a defender of the veterans, and fool people who couldn't reason well enough to realize he caused the very situation. He told that woman that SHE should be ashamed for doing her job as he and his fellow politicians directed. How dare he tell her to be ashamed for his actions? His cognitive dissonance level must be off the chart. It tells voters something EXTREMELY IMPORTANT about a person when he seeks office in the future. To compare it to "Miss America goes to the beach" is extremely dismissive of the right of citizens to know who they are voting for. 15:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC) D.Brooks 11 am 10/4/13
This is not a forum for general discussion of the particular incident. This is a forum for discussing the article about Randy Neugebauer. Getting into a deep debate about the General Schedule is unnecessary. Let's focus on the impact of the incident and what level of coverage the incident should receive in the encyclopedia. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 03:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
On October 4, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed an ethics complaint against Neugebauer (R-Texas) for publicly scolding a park ranger over the closure of the WWII Memorial in the government shutdown. They said said Neugebauer abused his position by attempting to “coerce” the ranger to allow access to the memorial. [5]
71.191.96.38 ( talk) 03:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Randy Neugebauer. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Randy Neugebauer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Randy Neugebauer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Committee Assignments Need to be Updated--request edit
Subcommittee Names and Assignments have changed in 113th Congress.
Financial Services:
Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance (Chairman)
[1]
Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises
[2]
Agriculture:
Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management
Subcommittee on Livestock Dairy and Poultry is now Livestock, Rural Development, and CreditCite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the
help page).
Subcommittee on Environment
[3]
Starfi$h (
talk) 19:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Edit needed request change
The second paragraph is incorrect: 'Neugebauer finished first in the crowded seven-way, all-Republican field.' It was in fact a seventeen-way field [4] Starfi$h ( talk) 15:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I just reverted an edit regarding a minor incident with a Park Ranger. The edit was filled with POV terms and written in an overly dramatic manner. Even the title of the section, calling it a "showdown" was over the top. Even without the POV terms, this is a big case of WP:RECENTISM. We're not a newspaper and this minor event will probably disappear from the news cycle quickly. I think we need to discuss it here first. Niteshift36 ( talk) 20:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Disagree. It's a citeable event that happened, and its definitely not a minor event. Actions, words, and speeches by highly-visible politicians are clearly article content. I don't see you making the same case for the "Baby Killer" topic. 108.131.133.245 ( 108.131.133.245) — 108.131.133.245 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
I wouldn't call it a non-event: it's an event that's "gone viral", and speaks well to the congressman's biographical profile. Many voters rely on WikiPedia come election time, as they otherwise pay no attention to politicians. Congressman Neugebauer's pubic record is a matter of biographical lore. It appears you're injecting a fair amount of your opinion and political beliefs into your argument for removing any mention of public events that Congressman Neugebauer is the center of.
108.131.133.245 (
108.131.133.245)—
108.131.133.245 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding
unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
Still not seeing any support for your claim of "non-event" or that you're not injecting your one-sided political beliefs into the argument. 108.131.133.245 ( 108.131.133.245)— 108.131.133.245 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
Your Wiki profile suggest you're a card-carrying republican. Removal of mention of this significant event from his Wiki page, by you, is pretty clearly politically motivated.
108.131.133.245 (
108.131.133.245) —
108.131.133.245 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding
unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
I probably could figure it out, but it's entertaining seeing you get bent out of shape over unsigned posts.....I'm thinking I should edit the whole article...remove everything not 10 years old. Since no one uses Wikipedia as an information source, especially high shcoolers and voters, who'll notice?.
108.131.133.245 (
108.131.133.245) —
108.131.133.245 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding
unsigned comment was added at UTC timestamp (UTC).
I am not very experienced in Wikipedia, but I feel this recent incident with the park ranger is a significant event, as important as him shouting baby killer at someone. The reason I believe this is that I have been the unpaid Park Ranger working the barrier and taking the abuse of the general public during prior shutdowns. Now, most of these people are frustrated and confused. They don't understand that it is not a decision the ranger at the barrier made, which is keeping them from entering, but a decision made by the leaders of the nation. When one of the leaders of the nation who caused the incident berates a person making barely above minimum wage, basically at one of the lowest levels of authority over that opening or closing decision, OVER AN INCIDENT HE HIMSELF CREATED that is an unprecedented level of hypocrisy and posturing for the cameras. He thought he'd look like a defender of the veterans, and fool people who couldn't reason well enough to realize he caused the very situation. He told that woman that SHE should be ashamed for doing her job as he and his fellow politicians directed. How dare he tell her to be ashamed for his actions? His cognitive dissonance level must be off the chart. It tells voters something EXTREMELY IMPORTANT about a person when he seeks office in the future. To compare it to "Miss America goes to the beach" is extremely dismissive of the right of citizens to know who they are voting for. 15:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC) D.Brooks 11 am 10/4/13
This is not a forum for general discussion of the particular incident. This is a forum for discussing the article about Randy Neugebauer. Getting into a deep debate about the General Schedule is unnecessary. Let's focus on the impact of the incident and what level of coverage the incident should receive in the encyclopedia. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 03:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
On October 4, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed an ethics complaint against Neugebauer (R-Texas) for publicly scolding a park ranger over the closure of the WWII Memorial in the government shutdown. They said said Neugebauer abused his position by attempting to “coerce” the ranger to allow access to the memorial. [5]
71.191.96.38 ( talk) 03:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Randy Neugebauer. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Randy Neugebauer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)