This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ramoche Temple article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
please see http://www.thdl.org/xml/show.php?xml=collections/history/hsct/sites/hsctregions.xml&div=hsct5705&m=hp, (Latitude 29°39.517', Longitude 91°07.833' ) quite reasonable. Could someone more intelligent enter them please. Fritz Jörn ( talk) 08:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)--
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ramoche Temple/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I have upgraded this article from "Stub" class to "Start" class because I have added some more text, two references, and a couple of external links. It could certainly do with more work, though. I will try to get back to it again soon. John Hill 17:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 17:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Qiushufang, you deleted hours of solid editorial work with sources. Your only reason is that Treasury of Lives "Ramoche" entry does not mention Ramoche...
It's entitled Ramoche, and has solid information with sources, dates, and names. Yes. The other sources which you also deleted are also solid and reliable. Yes. Maybe you are confused about reliable sources, or maybe you prefer fabricated narratives that do not have sources?
Neither are good positions since you are writing on Wikipedia. What is the objective?
I've spent hours correcting misinformation, including typographic errors, with the reading public in mind - they deserve correct information based on scholarly works.
Thus, I discovered there are interrelated subjects whose information was very inaccurate : On this page here, and on Jokhang, on Jowo statues, on Bhrikuti, and, frankly, I couldn't navigate through all of the disinformation on Wencheng. Maybe you can focus your efforts there, where they are needed, and try to hone a proper encyclopaedic entry on the deserving subject.
Please undo your re-introduction of inaccurate information on this page, and do not reintroduce inaccurate information again.
Take an hour to read my edits and their sources in order to learn about the factual history of the interrelated subjects. Factual history is much more interesting than inaccurate history, or disinformation.
Furthermore, it's rather shameful for an encyclopedia to carry what you just reintroduced here, on Ramoche. 49.126.88.34 ( talk) 05:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ramoche Temple article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
please see http://www.thdl.org/xml/show.php?xml=collections/history/hsct/sites/hsctregions.xml&div=hsct5705&m=hp, (Latitude 29°39.517', Longitude 91°07.833' ) quite reasonable. Could someone more intelligent enter them please. Fritz Jörn ( talk) 08:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)--
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ramoche Temple/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I have upgraded this article from "Stub" class to "Start" class because I have added some more text, two references, and a couple of external links. It could certainly do with more work, though. I will try to get back to it again soon. John Hill 17:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 17:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Qiushufang, you deleted hours of solid editorial work with sources. Your only reason is that Treasury of Lives "Ramoche" entry does not mention Ramoche...
It's entitled Ramoche, and has solid information with sources, dates, and names. Yes. The other sources which you also deleted are also solid and reliable. Yes. Maybe you are confused about reliable sources, or maybe you prefer fabricated narratives that do not have sources?
Neither are good positions since you are writing on Wikipedia. What is the objective?
I've spent hours correcting misinformation, including typographic errors, with the reading public in mind - they deserve correct information based on scholarly works.
Thus, I discovered there are interrelated subjects whose information was very inaccurate : On this page here, and on Jokhang, on Jowo statues, on Bhrikuti, and, frankly, I couldn't navigate through all of the disinformation on Wencheng. Maybe you can focus your efforts there, where they are needed, and try to hone a proper encyclopaedic entry on the deserving subject.
Please undo your re-introduction of inaccurate information on this page, and do not reintroduce inaccurate information again.
Take an hour to read my edits and their sources in order to learn about the factual history of the interrelated subjects. Factual history is much more interesting than inaccurate history, or disinformation.
Furthermore, it's rather shameful for an encyclopedia to carry what you just reintroduced here, on Ramoche. 49.126.88.34 ( talk) 05:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)