This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pretty sure an article that details his 44 books having low literary value
isn't self-published. If so, he should probably hire a PR person.
see here.
Praxidicae (
talk) 15:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
lukewarm (or luke coolfor me too. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I am not a POV pusher (whatever that is), and I am glad that my edits to this page were upheld after discussion by other writers. I was unfairly banned for these edits but that is a different story. 14:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benarasibabu ( talk • contribs)
It seems inappropriate for the controversy section to be the largest chunk of information about a current Union Minister and former Chief Minister. Surely, this could be largely condensed to indicate he has made several controversial statements and let readers follow the sources to know more? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MadrasChecks ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Disagree too. It is the most useful part for us, non-Indian readers. Let us keep it. Zezen ( talk) 09:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Here I have mentioned few of his books, but for some of them I can't find any references so I cited the books itself. Is this acceptable ? -- Aryan ( है?) 10:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
:::: 1 person says that ‘No literary value’ but 'high on patriotism', two have not came across his works, other person feels that his work 'connects with people' and the last says that the books are a 'commercial success' and that many of his books were published before him becoming the CM. The same article mentions few of his books are translated into other languages and that one of them have been adapted into a film. Yet, the article mentions only the negative aspects of his works. I'm back on WP after a long time, is there a template to propose text ?-- Aryan ( है?) 05:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Rhode Island Red: The Ministry of Human Development changed its name to the Ministry of Education. The mention of Minister of Education can be found here https://indianexpress.com/article/education/mhrd-is-now-ministry-of-education-new-education-policy-to-unveil-at-4-pm-6529072/. Manabimasu ( talk) 23:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
In one of
my edits I removed the following text: In 2019, after being appointed as the HRD Minister, Pokhriyal issued a directive saying that all the files and note sheets forwarded to him must be in Hindi. This created controversy with ministry officials, as not all of them had the level of proficiency in Hindi needed to prepare notes in that language, and the norm until then had been to prepare all official notes in English. Even though the government had traditionally encouraged officials to have a working knowledge of Hindi, existing rules did not make it compulsory for officials to be highly proficient in Hindi.
[1]
[2]
. This lead to a
warning on my talk page as well as it is included as a
ARE violation (not sure about the name for the term). The second source mentions: So, when the HRD Minister has the temerity to demand that all communication be made to him in Hindi, I feel a double or even a triple anger. One, why should someone be making official communications in Hindi when their mother tongue might be Telugu, Odia, Kutchi or Khasi?
[2] Everything above this is the author's personal experience and below it is why hindi,RSS,German,BJP is bad. The relevant sentences from the first source are:Human resource development minister Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank has got an order issued saying all the files and note sheets forwarded to him must be in Hindi,
,The order, issued by the higher education department last month, has left a large section of ministry officials in a flutter. Files and note sheets have always been written largely in English, they say, adding that not all of them have the proficiency in Hindi to be able to write in the language.
and According to the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, “an employee may record a note or minute on a file in Hindi or in English without being himself required to furnish a translation thereof in the other language”.
[1]. It also says Files and note sheets have always been written largely in English,
[1] while the article says , and the norm until then had been to prepare all official notes in English
. I don't think it would be considered a controversy (considering he did not do anything that was not in his official capacity, nor did he asked for documents in a language other than specified. I think this should be removed from the controversy section section, but hisprefrence of hindi in official documents may be mention elsewhere. --
User:श्रीमान २००२ (
User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 05:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
References
I am removing He also misquoted that
Charaka, hailed as one of the principal contributors of Ayurveda, was the first person who researched and discovered atoms and molecules, when in actuality, it was 6th century BCE philosopher
Kanada who developed the foundations of an atomistic approach to physics and philosophy in the Sanskrit text
Vaiśeṣika Sūtra.
[1]
as only the second part of the sentence is backed by the source.--
User:श्रीमान २००२ (
User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 06:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Person died on 31 August 2020. I am requesting admin to change it as soon as possible Sayampradhan ( talk) 04:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pretty sure an article that details his 44 books having low literary value
isn't self-published. If so, he should probably hire a PR person.
see here.
Praxidicae (
talk) 15:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
lukewarm (or luke coolfor me too. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I am not a POV pusher (whatever that is), and I am glad that my edits to this page were upheld after discussion by other writers. I was unfairly banned for these edits but that is a different story. 14:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benarasibabu ( talk • contribs)
It seems inappropriate for the controversy section to be the largest chunk of information about a current Union Minister and former Chief Minister. Surely, this could be largely condensed to indicate he has made several controversial statements and let readers follow the sources to know more? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MadrasChecks ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Disagree too. It is the most useful part for us, non-Indian readers. Let us keep it. Zezen ( talk) 09:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Here I have mentioned few of his books, but for some of them I can't find any references so I cited the books itself. Is this acceptable ? -- Aryan ( है?) 10:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
:::: 1 person says that ‘No literary value’ but 'high on patriotism', two have not came across his works, other person feels that his work 'connects with people' and the last says that the books are a 'commercial success' and that many of his books were published before him becoming the CM. The same article mentions few of his books are translated into other languages and that one of them have been adapted into a film. Yet, the article mentions only the negative aspects of his works. I'm back on WP after a long time, is there a template to propose text ?-- Aryan ( है?) 05:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Rhode Island Red: The Ministry of Human Development changed its name to the Ministry of Education. The mention of Minister of Education can be found here https://indianexpress.com/article/education/mhrd-is-now-ministry-of-education-new-education-policy-to-unveil-at-4-pm-6529072/. Manabimasu ( talk) 23:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
In one of
my edits I removed the following text: In 2019, after being appointed as the HRD Minister, Pokhriyal issued a directive saying that all the files and note sheets forwarded to him must be in Hindi. This created controversy with ministry officials, as not all of them had the level of proficiency in Hindi needed to prepare notes in that language, and the norm until then had been to prepare all official notes in English. Even though the government had traditionally encouraged officials to have a working knowledge of Hindi, existing rules did not make it compulsory for officials to be highly proficient in Hindi.
[1]
[2]
. This lead to a
warning on my talk page as well as it is included as a
ARE violation (not sure about the name for the term). The second source mentions: So, when the HRD Minister has the temerity to demand that all communication be made to him in Hindi, I feel a double or even a triple anger. One, why should someone be making official communications in Hindi when their mother tongue might be Telugu, Odia, Kutchi or Khasi?
[2] Everything above this is the author's personal experience and below it is why hindi,RSS,German,BJP is bad. The relevant sentences from the first source are:Human resource development minister Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank has got an order issued saying all the files and note sheets forwarded to him must be in Hindi,
,The order, issued by the higher education department last month, has left a large section of ministry officials in a flutter. Files and note sheets have always been written largely in English, they say, adding that not all of them have the proficiency in Hindi to be able to write in the language.
and According to the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, “an employee may record a note or minute on a file in Hindi or in English without being himself required to furnish a translation thereof in the other language”.
[1]. It also says Files and note sheets have always been written largely in English,
[1] while the article says , and the norm until then had been to prepare all official notes in English
. I don't think it would be considered a controversy (considering he did not do anything that was not in his official capacity, nor did he asked for documents in a language other than specified. I think this should be removed from the controversy section section, but hisprefrence of hindi in official documents may be mention elsewhere. --
User:श्रीमान २००२ (
User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 05:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
References
I am removing He also misquoted that
Charaka, hailed as one of the principal contributors of Ayurveda, was the first person who researched and discovered atoms and molecules, when in actuality, it was 6th century BCE philosopher
Kanada who developed the foundations of an atomistic approach to physics and philosophy in the Sanskrit text
Vaiśeṣika Sūtra.
[1]
as only the second part of the sentence is backed by the source.--
User:श्रीमान २००२ (
User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 06:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Person died on 31 August 2020. I am requesting admin to change it as soon as possible Sayampradhan ( talk) 04:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)