![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The talk history of this page needs to be deleted. The information contained herein is invalid. I have been authorized by the company executives to take care of that. We are suspecting either competitors or dissatisfied employees to post false statements in an effort to discredit Ramco's business. There is possibility of company sensitive, proprietary & confidential information being posted by unauthorized and dishonest users. Please grant Semi-protection status to Ramco Systems page, so we can resolve all the concerns and update the page with valid information. Appreciate your support in this matter.
Please block user Levitra123 from posting anything to Ramco Systems website - the only posting done by this user have been negative towards Ramco Systems business and not supported by any factual information.
Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 17:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Mr James Ramco is not the world leader in aviation software. What is the source for that? The building posted is not their own too. It was sold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Levitra123 ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Have to agree to the objection to refering to Ramco Solutions as the world leader in aviation software, aviation MRO software or ERP software - there is just no basis for any of these marketing claims. Ramco does not have as many customers, nor revenues, nor profits, nor any other normal measure that could possibly justify such a claim. Having someone who admittedly works for or has some connnection to the company making such a claim - sort of proves the invalidness of the claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgePBurdell IV ( talk • contribs) 14:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This article needs to be cleaned up. It reads like an advertisement. -- Sperril 09:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Upon further review, I've re-added the NPOV tag as well. This article needs attention. -- Sperril 09:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
I have done some cleaning up. Does anyone think more needs to be done? JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible to remove the "This article is written like an advertisement" status? All advertising remarks seem to have been removed and there is no need for the status of the page anymore in my opinion. Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 16:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Is it also possible to remove the history of Levitra123 entries? Right now it is still there and accessible to be viewed. Since the remarks have been removed from the main page. Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 16:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Logo to be changed plz. The new logo looks absolutely nice.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by VishravarsP ( talk • contribs) 04:56, 2 March 2007
There is a new logo that has changed in the last year. How can i submit it ? here is how the logo looks now http://ramcoaviation.com/ it has a different color layout/ gradient format Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 16:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
There is currently a line in the article (last line of first section) about Ramco causing cancer in california that is obviously rubbish.
Please delete / clean up. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.229.226 ( talk) 14:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that Ramco Group doesn't have its own article but many of its companies/former companies do. Does it merit one? I'll take a stab at looking for reliable sources. Cheers. Scheianf ( talk) 20:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
CV like contents recently added. potential COI Graywalls ( talk) 21:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The talk history of this page needs to be deleted. The information contained herein is invalid. I have been authorized by the company executives to take care of that. We are suspecting either competitors or dissatisfied employees to post false statements in an effort to discredit Ramco's business. There is possibility of company sensitive, proprietary & confidential information being posted by unauthorized and dishonest users. Please grant Semi-protection status to Ramco Systems page, so we can resolve all the concerns and update the page with valid information. Appreciate your support in this matter.
Please block user Levitra123 from posting anything to Ramco Systems website - the only posting done by this user have been negative towards Ramco Systems business and not supported by any factual information.
Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 17:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Mr James Ramco is not the world leader in aviation software. What is the source for that? The building posted is not their own too. It was sold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Levitra123 ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Have to agree to the objection to refering to Ramco Solutions as the world leader in aviation software, aviation MRO software or ERP software - there is just no basis for any of these marketing claims. Ramco does not have as many customers, nor revenues, nor profits, nor any other normal measure that could possibly justify such a claim. Having someone who admittedly works for or has some connnection to the company making such a claim - sort of proves the invalidness of the claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgePBurdell IV ( talk • contribs) 14:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This article needs to be cleaned up. It reads like an advertisement. -- Sperril 09:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Upon further review, I've re-added the NPOV tag as well. This article needs attention. -- Sperril 09:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
I have done some cleaning up. Does anyone think more needs to be done? JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible to remove the "This article is written like an advertisement" status? All advertising remarks seem to have been removed and there is no need for the status of the page anymore in my opinion. Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 16:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Is it also possible to remove the history of Levitra123 entries? Right now it is still there and accessible to be viewed. Since the remarks have been removed from the main page. Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 16:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Logo to be changed plz. The new logo looks absolutely nice.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by VishravarsP ( talk • contribs) 04:56, 2 March 2007
There is a new logo that has changed in the last year. How can i submit it ? here is how the logo looks now http://ramcoaviation.com/ it has a different color layout/ gradient format Wikiupdaterrr ( talk) 16:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
There is currently a line in the article (last line of first section) about Ramco causing cancer in california that is obviously rubbish.
Please delete / clean up. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.229.226 ( talk) 14:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that Ramco Group doesn't have its own article but many of its companies/former companies do. Does it merit one? I'll take a stab at looking for reliable sources. Cheers. Scheianf ( talk) 20:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
CV like contents recently added. potential COI Graywalls ( talk) 21:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)