This page was proposed for deletion by TTN ( talk · contribs) on 13 March 2020. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
To Kusonaga
I've put plenty of time into the article (from creation onwards) and several people have come away quite happy with it. If you want to change it to your version, then I suggest we put it to some kind of vote if such a forum for disagreements exist. Let me know. Please do not revert without going tru that forum. I dont feel like starting an edit war and would like to resolve it in a civil way.
Sunburst 23:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Kusonaga
The discussion I was going for was Civil. By using the word DICK, you proved yourself to be one. The tone of your argument is particularly rude, insulting and arrogant.
Here's what I would have liked to have done
Choice of image is subjective. My opinion is it is good, yours is it is bad. niether opinion has much validity.
Good point. agreed. I didnt add the box, and belittling thier efforts does not help the community orientation of wiki, a simple addition will be fine.
I didnt wikidate the links, they were done by others. you could have easily said so and it would have been taken care off.
again, rude language. i dont come often to wiki, all that would have been needed was a request.
just remove it.
What was done by the character was in the past. if current actions were ongoing, it would have been presented as such.
All were discussed in the box.
the very defination of people who follow these stories is fan. theres nothing wrong about this.
a simple addition would have suffice rather then hacking the article to bits.
no idea what you are talking about
didnt add the links, when it was added, i simply respected the intent of the user to add his bit to the page.
Now, I'm going to revert it again. If you do so again without being able to counter any of the points brought up, we can, if necessary ask other users to weigh in, or as a last resort, bring this to a mediation council, but I don't really think that should be necessary.
Sunburst 17:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
---
K,
I asked you to talk to me before making such drastic changes again. Given that i wrote most of it, it would have been CIVIL and COURTEOUS of you to talk. But as you said, you were "not" trying being a dick and went ahead and did it.
Yes, I agree with somethings and disagree with others. I havent have the time to make the changes yet.
It was your language and tone that offended me FULLY. Using the word Dick at the begining of your note and then claiming not wanting to offend is doublefaced. at one point you refer to something as asinine (sic). Being that Wikipedia is worldwide I dont know where you are from, but if you used this language directly where I'm from it will have you kicked hard.
Unfortunately I dont have the time to continue this given that i can only once in a while come by and check the page. Given that you have the time, you win this little ego trip of yours by default for now. There is a grammatical mistake i noticed on your page, you may have to correct that (sad you'll be using so much of what i put in).
however, lets make something very clear, you really do seem like a prick, so do correct that opening line of yours.
Sunburst 00:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Qarrigatakopolips.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
This page was proposed for deletion by TTN ( talk · contribs) on 13 March 2020. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
To Kusonaga
I've put plenty of time into the article (from creation onwards) and several people have come away quite happy with it. If you want to change it to your version, then I suggest we put it to some kind of vote if such a forum for disagreements exist. Let me know. Please do not revert without going tru that forum. I dont feel like starting an edit war and would like to resolve it in a civil way.
Sunburst 23:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Kusonaga
The discussion I was going for was Civil. By using the word DICK, you proved yourself to be one. The tone of your argument is particularly rude, insulting and arrogant.
Here's what I would have liked to have done
Choice of image is subjective. My opinion is it is good, yours is it is bad. niether opinion has much validity.
Good point. agreed. I didnt add the box, and belittling thier efforts does not help the community orientation of wiki, a simple addition will be fine.
I didnt wikidate the links, they were done by others. you could have easily said so and it would have been taken care off.
again, rude language. i dont come often to wiki, all that would have been needed was a request.
just remove it.
What was done by the character was in the past. if current actions were ongoing, it would have been presented as such.
All were discussed in the box.
the very defination of people who follow these stories is fan. theres nothing wrong about this.
a simple addition would have suffice rather then hacking the article to bits.
no idea what you are talking about
didnt add the links, when it was added, i simply respected the intent of the user to add his bit to the page.
Now, I'm going to revert it again. If you do so again without being able to counter any of the points brought up, we can, if necessary ask other users to weigh in, or as a last resort, bring this to a mediation council, but I don't really think that should be necessary.
Sunburst 17:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
---
K,
I asked you to talk to me before making such drastic changes again. Given that i wrote most of it, it would have been CIVIL and COURTEOUS of you to talk. But as you said, you were "not" trying being a dick and went ahead and did it.
Yes, I agree with somethings and disagree with others. I havent have the time to make the changes yet.
It was your language and tone that offended me FULLY. Using the word Dick at the begining of your note and then claiming not wanting to offend is doublefaced. at one point you refer to something as asinine (sic). Being that Wikipedia is worldwide I dont know where you are from, but if you used this language directly where I'm from it will have you kicked hard.
Unfortunately I dont have the time to continue this given that i can only once in a while come by and check the page. Given that you have the time, you win this little ego trip of yours by default for now. There is a grammatical mistake i noticed on your page, you may have to correct that (sad you'll be using so much of what i put in).
however, lets make something very clear, you really do seem like a prick, so do correct that opening line of yours.
Sunburst 00:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Qarrigatakopolips.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)