| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rainbow Fraternity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Rainbow Fraternity was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 6, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rainbow Fraternity/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Guerillero ( talk · contribs) 04:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 6, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: ✗ Fail
- 2. Verifiable?: ✗ Fail
- 3. Broad in coverage?: ✗ Fail
- 4. Neutral point of view?: ✓ Pass
- 5. Stable?: ✓ Pass
- 6. Images?: ✓ Pass
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Guerillero | My Talk 04:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rainbow Fraternity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Rainbow Fraternity was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 6, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
|
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rainbow Fraternity/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Guerillero ( talk · contribs) 04:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 6, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: ✗ Fail
- 2. Verifiable?: ✗ Fail
- 3. Broad in coverage?: ✗ Fail
- 4. Neutral point of view?: ✓ Pass
- 5. Stable?: ✓ Pass
- 6. Images?: ✓ Pass
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Guerillero | My Talk 04:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)