![]() | Rainbow/PUSH has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 10, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the merged
Rainbow/PUSH is an outgrowth of
Jesse Jackson's 1984
Presidential campaign and a factional split in
Operation Breadbasket, an affiliate of the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs to better explain what function the Rainbow and PUSH where formed to do and what as a combined entity they do these days. Where they cival rights orginizations like the NAACP? Someone knowledgable on the Rainbow/PUSH should expand the article. -- Cab88 01:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
It also needs to be known what the Rainbow/PUSH organization calls its' combined self, and what it is known as for short. it certantly can't be Rainbow/PUSH! Also, WHY was the National Rainbow Coalition formed, if there already was Operation PUSH? -- EdgeCalibur 00:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Is this the same rainbow coalition that goes around in buses trying to force construction sites to hire there members? because if so we NEED to include some sources about there violence record. Joesolo13 ( talk) 13:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 23:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 09:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
WP:NPOV does not say remove one extreme point of view and describe it as unreliable. It says include all sides. Removing his points is irresponsible. Even worse is all the points that were left in the article, but stripped of their citations. Leave the refs in. The proper thing to do is to find counterpoints and add them to the article, IMO.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 20:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Tried to point it out, but was reverted. 88.159.79.223 ( talk) 23:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rainbow/PUSH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Rainbow/PUSH has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 10, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the merged
Rainbow/PUSH is an outgrowth of
Jesse Jackson's 1984
Presidential campaign and a factional split in
Operation Breadbasket, an affiliate of the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs to better explain what function the Rainbow and PUSH where formed to do and what as a combined entity they do these days. Where they cival rights orginizations like the NAACP? Someone knowledgable on the Rainbow/PUSH should expand the article. -- Cab88 01:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
It also needs to be known what the Rainbow/PUSH organization calls its' combined self, and what it is known as for short. it certantly can't be Rainbow/PUSH! Also, WHY was the National Rainbow Coalition formed, if there already was Operation PUSH? -- EdgeCalibur 00:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Is this the same rainbow coalition that goes around in buses trying to force construction sites to hire there members? because if so we NEED to include some sources about there violence record. Joesolo13 ( talk) 13:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 23:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 09:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
WP:NPOV does not say remove one extreme point of view and describe it as unreliable. It says include all sides. Removing his points is irresponsible. Even worse is all the points that were left in the article, but stripped of their citations. Leave the refs in. The proper thing to do is to find counterpoints and add them to the article, IMO.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 20:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Tried to point it out, but was reverted. 88.159.79.223 ( talk) 23:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rainbow/PUSH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)