This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Railway Labor Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The wording seems a bit awkward under "'Major' and 'Minor' Disputes." Could someone please clarify what it means? ArphaxadHunter ( talk) 00:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah, never mind. I just misread it. Sorry about that. Please forgive me and disregard my earlier statements. I really wasn't thinking. ArphaxadHunter ( talk) 00:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Without inline citations -- or any citations at all! -- this article can't be a B-class anything. C-class at most, and only the length prevents it from dropping to Start-class. - Tim1965 ( talk) 01:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Railway Labor Act. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Railway Labor Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
This article should do more to discuss the processes that the Act created, particularly as an early example of a Cooling-off Period (the 30-day hold), from sources such as
KevinCuddeback ( talk) 16:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Railway Labor Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The wording seems a bit awkward under "'Major' and 'Minor' Disputes." Could someone please clarify what it means? ArphaxadHunter ( talk) 00:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah, never mind. I just misread it. Sorry about that. Please forgive me and disregard my earlier statements. I really wasn't thinking. ArphaxadHunter ( talk) 00:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Without inline citations -- or any citations at all! -- this article can't be a B-class anything. C-class at most, and only the length prevents it from dropping to Start-class. - Tim1965 ( talk) 01:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Railway Labor Act. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Railway Labor Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
This article should do more to discuss the processes that the Act created, particularly as an early example of a Cooling-off Period (the 30-day hold), from sources such as
KevinCuddeback ( talk) 16:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)