![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Raid on Tendra Spit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Raid on Tendra Spit, along with other pages relating to the Russo-Ukrainian War, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. |
This article needs non-copyrighted photos. Any help finding some would be very much appreciated Salfanto ( talk) 13:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Salfanto, I have reviewed and copy-edited the article commencing with this edit. At each point, I have provided edit summaries to explain the edits and why, in many cases, there is directly relevant WP:P&G. Overall though, and article is written in summary style. The net result of my review was this edit. Save the lead sentences, you have restored the article in full ( here) and made a minor edit ( here, that combines an orphaned sentence into another paragraph. You have provided no edit summaries. You have reinstated material from questionable sources (sources which are reasonably considered to be a WP:RS). You have also reinstated information that has failed verification, is not supported by a source or may well fall to WP:SYNTH. The reinstatement also degrades the referencing by reinstating many duplicate references. Cinderella157 ( talk) 01:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Notified at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Cinderella157 ( talk) 02:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Question, how come the revert removed so much of the article's content? Salfanto ( talk) 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
We can live without the filibustering of a dismissed Ukrainian general per WP:VNOT.Also,
[w]e can live without the claims of a milblogger per WP:VNOT - even if their claim was reported in the Kyiv Post. At this point I considered there was not enough meat in the article to support dividing it into battle and aftermath sections, with the edit summary
merge sections - no enough meat here. Once you get rid of the journalistic padding, the propaganda, the synth, material attributed to questionable sources, material that outright fails verification and separate reporting of sources that can be singularly summarised, the article as it now stands is what you are left with. Cinderella157 ( talk) 00:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Raid on Tendra Spit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Raid on Tendra Spit, along with other pages relating to the Russo-Ukrainian War, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. |
This article needs non-copyrighted photos. Any help finding some would be very much appreciated Salfanto ( talk) 13:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Salfanto, I have reviewed and copy-edited the article commencing with this edit. At each point, I have provided edit summaries to explain the edits and why, in many cases, there is directly relevant WP:P&G. Overall though, and article is written in summary style. The net result of my review was this edit. Save the lead sentences, you have restored the article in full ( here) and made a minor edit ( here, that combines an orphaned sentence into another paragraph. You have provided no edit summaries. You have reinstated material from questionable sources (sources which are reasonably considered to be a WP:RS). You have also reinstated information that has failed verification, is not supported by a source or may well fall to WP:SYNTH. The reinstatement also degrades the referencing by reinstating many duplicate references. Cinderella157 ( talk) 01:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Notified at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Cinderella157 ( talk) 02:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Question, how come the revert removed so much of the article's content? Salfanto ( talk) 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
We can live without the filibustering of a dismissed Ukrainian general per WP:VNOT.Also,
[w]e can live without the claims of a milblogger per WP:VNOT - even if their claim was reported in the Kyiv Post. At this point I considered there was not enough meat in the article to support dividing it into battle and aftermath sections, with the edit summary
merge sections - no enough meat here. Once you get rid of the journalistic padding, the propaganda, the synth, material attributed to questionable sources, material that outright fails verification and separate reporting of sources that can be singularly summarised, the article as it now stands is what you are left with. Cinderella157 ( talk) 00:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)