Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

This article contains a lot of unaddressed citation needed tags (most of them years old), thus failing criterion 1b, which requires citations for statistics and challenged material. I will wait a week before closing this reassessment so editors can have the opportunity to fix these issues.-- FutureTrillionaire ( talk) 01:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I've handled all but two of them. DMacks ( talk) 05:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC) reply

...which User:King jakob c 2 and I cleared. DMacks ( talk) 08:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply

@ DMacks: Hold on, the article contains at least 5 one-sentence paragraphs (mostly in the Application and Health risks sections). MOS:PARAGRAPHS (which is part of MOS:LAYOUT, whose guidelines need to be met to satisfy criterion 1b) says: "The number of single-sentence paragraphs should be minimized." -- FutureTrillionaire ( talk) 13:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply

All done (I think?) except for the "industrial radiography" in Radon#Scientific. DMacks ( talk) 15:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Done that one now also. DMacks ( talk) 21:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Nice job. All the issues I've found have been fixed.-- FutureTrillionaire ( talk) 22:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Result: Kept.-- FutureTrillionaire ( talk) 22:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply

If this article mentions a study that found only an increased risk when exposed to passive smoking, should that not be mentioned in the domestic-level exposure section? Sounds important enough, it means that most people don't have to worry about radon! Ssscienccce ( talk) 08:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC) reply