From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

???

so BP ~= AD*1.03 and 0 AD was not ~1950 BP but ~2008,5 BP ? 07:29, February 23, 2006 Ollj

How do you arrive to such nonsense conclusions? If you explain, I'll explain too. Jclerman 14:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC) reply

delete rather than merge

Jclerman 17:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Merge rather than delete

... IMHO ( Talk) 15:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Didn't need to do anything

All of the information on this page was already on the Radiocarbon dating page. Problem solved. 24.126.199.129 19:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

???

so BP ~= AD*1.03 and 0 AD was not ~1950 BP but ~2008,5 BP ? 07:29, February 23, 2006 Ollj

How do you arrive to such nonsense conclusions? If you explain, I'll explain too. Jclerman 14:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC) reply

delete rather than merge

Jclerman 17:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Merge rather than delete

... IMHO ( Talk) 15:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Didn't need to do anything

All of the information on this page was already on the Radiocarbon dating page. Problem solved. 24.126.199.129 19:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook